Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854112›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of dermatology2022

Metronidazole gel (0.75%) in Japanese patients with rosacea: A randomized, vehicle-controlled, phase 3 study.

Yoshiki Miyachi, Kenshi Yamasaki, Tomomitsu Fujita, Chie Fujii

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of dermatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The Latest Advances in Rosacea Treatment: A Systematic Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Rosacea: Practical Guidance and Challenges for Clinical Management.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiki MiyachiGraduate School of Public Health, Shizuoka Graduate University of Public Health, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1861-8071
Kenshi YamasakiDepartment of Dermatology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-4956
Tomomitsu FujitaClinical Development Department, Maruho Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan.
Chie FujiiClinical Development Department, Maruho Co., Ltd, Kyoto, Japan.
Maruho (Japan) · JPTohoku University · JP

Funding

Maruho Co., Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical metronidazole is not currently approved in Japan as a treatment for the indication of rosacea, although 0.75% metronidazole gel was authorized in 2014 for the management of cancerous skin ulcers. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.75% metronidazole gel in Japanese patients with inflammatory lesions (papules/pustules) and erythema associated with moderate to severe rosacea. Overall, 130 patients were randomly assigned to receive 0.75% metronidazole gel (n = 65) or vehicle (n = 65), and 120 patients completed 12 weeks of treatment. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved both of the following at week 12: an improvement of >50% in the number of inflammatory lesions (papules/pustules) and a positive change of at least one degree in erythema severity. This composite outcome was achieved by 72.3% of metronidazole-treated patients versus 36.9% of vehicle-treated patients, with the between-group difference demonstrating significant improvement with 0.75% metronidazole gel (p < 0.0001). All secondary efficacy endpoints (patients achieving a score of ≥3 for percent change in the number of inflammatory lesions at week 12; patients achieving a score of ≥3 for change in erythema severity at week 12; patients achieving an Investigator's Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 at week 12; percent change over time in the number of inflammatory lesions; change over time in erythema severity) also showed improvement in the 0.75% metronidazole gel group. The incidence of adverse events was higher with metronidazole (40.0%) than with vehicle (29.2%). Of these, treatment-related, treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 9.2% and 6.2% in the metronidazole and the vehicle group, respectively, but there were no new safety concerns. Overall, the results of this study have confirmed the efficacy and safety of 0.75% metronidazole gel in Japanese patients with rosacea.

Indexed as

Dermatologic AgentsRosaceaDouble-Blind MethodHumansJapanMetronidazoleTreatment OutcomeDermatologic AgentsMetronidazoleclinical trial, phase IIIJapanesemetronidazolerosacea

Identifiers

PMID34854112
PMCPMC9299697
OpenAlexW3216548618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.