Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854081›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2022

Recurrence of preterm births: A population-based linkage with 3.5 million live births from the CIDACS Birth Cohort.

Aline S Rocha, Rita de Cássia Ribeiro-Silva, Enny S Paixao, Ila R Falcão, Flavia Jôse O Alves, Naiá Ortelan, Marcia F de Almeida, Rosemeire L Fiaccone, Laura C Rodrigues, Maria Yury Ichihara and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aline S RochaSchool of Nutrition, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3806-6446
Rita de Cássia Ribeiro-SilvaSchool of Nutrition, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.
Enny S PaixaoCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Ila R FalcãoSchool of Nutrition, Federal University of Bahia (UFBA), Salvador, Brazil.
Flavia Jôse O AlvesCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Naiá OrtelanCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Marcia F de AlmeidaSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Rosemeire L FiacconeCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Laura C RodriguesInstitute of Collective Health, Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.
Maria Yury IchiharaCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Mauricio L BarretoCenter for Data and Knowledge Integration for Health (CIDACS), Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Salvador, Brazil.
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRHospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo · BRLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESDepartment of Science and Technology of the State of Bahia (SECTI)Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos - FINEPFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado da Bahia - FAPESBMCTI/CNPq/MS/SCTIE/Decit/the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's Grandes Desafios Brasil - Desenvolvimento Saudável para Todas as Crianças 47/2014Wellcome Trust 202912Wellcome Trust 202912/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the recurrence of preterm birth (PTB) among the poorest half of the Brazilian population.

methodsA population-based retrospective study was conducted in Brazil with the live births of multiparous women extracted from the CIDACS Birth Cohort between 2001 and 2015. We used multivariate logistic regression to estimate the odds of recurrent PTB in second and third births.

resultsA total of 3 528 050 live births from 1 764 025 multiparous women were analyzed. The adjusted odds for the occurrence of a PTB given a previous PTB was 2.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.53-2.62). Lower gestational age increased the odds of a subsequent PTB (<28 weeks: adjusted OR [aOR] 3.61, 95% CI 3.41-3.83; 28-31 weeks: aOR 3.34, 95% CI 3.19-3.49; and 32-36 weeks: aOR 2.42, 95% CI 2.38-2.47). Women who had two previous PTBs were at high risk of having a third (aOR 4.98, 95% CI 4.70-5.27). Recurrence of PTB was more likely when the inter-birth interval was less than 12 months.

conclusionIn Brazil, a middle-income country, women with a previous PTB had an increased risk of a subsequent one. This association was affected by gestational age, the number of PTBs, severity of previous PTBs, and a short interval between births.

Indexed as

Premature BirthBirth CohortFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornLive BirthPregnancyRetrospective StudiesRisk Factorsbirth cohortpoor populationspreterm birthrecurrent preterm birth

Identifiers

PMID34854081
PMCPMC7613286
OpenAlexW3216343223

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.