Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34854062›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2022

Effects of an individualised nutritional intervention to tackle malnutrition in nursing homes: a pre-post study.

J Seemer, E Kiesswetter, D Fleckenstein-Sußmann, M Gloning, S Bader-Mittermaier, C C Sieber, B Sixt, S Wurm, D Volkert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

J SeemerInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany. Johanna.seemer@fau.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1971-8026
E KiesswetterInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
D Fleckenstein-SußmannFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, Freising, Germany.
M GloningInstitute of Food Technology, Hochschule Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Freising, Germany.
S Bader-MittermaierFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, Freising, Germany.
C C SieberInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
B SixtInstitute of Food Technology, Hochschule Weihenstephan-Triesdorf, Freising, Germany.
S WurmInstitute for Community Medicine, Department of Prevention Research and Social Medicine, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
D VolkertInstitute for Biomedicine of Aging, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nuremberg, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging · DEWeihenstephan-Triesdorf University of Applied Sciences · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIndividualised interventions are recommended to tackle malnutrition in older adults, but approaches for nursing home (NH) residents are scarce. This study investigated the effects of an individualised nutritional intervention in NH residents with (risk of) malnutrition.

methodsIn a pre-post study, 6 weeks (w) of usual care were followed by 6w of intervention. The intervention consisted of up to three supplement modules (sweet and savoury protein creams and protein-energy drink, single or combined) and, if required, reshaped texture-modified meals (RTMM).

resultsFifty residents completed the study (84 ± 8 years, 74% female). One-third (32%) received RTMM. Additional 258 ± 167 kcal/day and 23 ± 15 g protein/day were offered. Mean daily energy intake increased by 207 (95%CI 47-368, p = 0.005) kcal and protein intake by 14 (7-21, p < 0.001) g (w12 vs w1). Quality of life (QoL) increased in the subscale "care relationship" (+ 9 (3-15) points, p = 0.002, w12 vs w6). Body weight, handgrip strength, and other QoL subscales did not change.

conclusionOur intervention improved dietary intake and one QoL subscale in NH residents with (risk of) malnutrition. As a next step, randomized controlled trials are needed to investigate the impact of individualised interventions more comprehensively.

Indexed as

MalnutritionQuality of LifeAgedFemaleHand StrengthHumansMaleNursing HomesNutritional StatusEnergy intakeFood supplementsIndividualisedMalnutritionNursing homeNutritional intervention

Identifiers

PMID34854062
PMCPMC9151515
OpenAlexW3216681599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.