ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2021
Cervical Muscle Activation Characteristics and Head Kinematics in Males and Females Following Acoustic Warnings and Impulsive Head Forces.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neck Motion and Injuries of Small Females and Midsize Males in Frontal Impacts at Two Severities.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Sex, head and neck posture, and cervical muscle preparation are contributing factors in the severity of head and neck injuries. However, it is unknown how these factors modulate the head kinematics. In this study, twenty-four (16 male and 8 female) participants experienced 50 impulsive forces to their heads with and without an acoustic warning. Female participants demonstrated a 71 ms faster (p = 0.002) muscle activation onset compared to males after warning. The magnitude of muscle activation was not significant between sexes. Females exhibited 21% (p < 0.008) greater peak angular velocity in all force directions and 18% (p < 0.04) greater peak angular acceleration in sagittal plane compared to males. Females exhibited 15% (p = 0.03) greater peak linear acceleration compared to males only in sagittal flexion. Preparation attenuated head kinematics significantly (p < 0.03) in 11 out of 18 investigated head kinematics for both sexes. A warning eliciting a startle response 420 ms prior to the impact resulted in significant attenuation of all measured head kinematics in sagittal extension (p < 0.037). In conclusion, both sex and warning type were significant factors in head kinematics. These data provide insight into the complex relationship of muscle activation and sex, and may help identify innovative strategies to reduce head and neck injury risk in sports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.