Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853914›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2022

Oncology care providers' awareness and practice related to physical activity promotion for breast cancer survivors and barriers and facilitators to such promotion: a nationwide cross-sectional web-based survey.

Yoichi Shimizu, Katsunori Tsuji, Eisuke Ochi, Ryo Okubo, Aya Kuchiba, Taichi Shimazu, Noriatsu Tatematsu, Naomi Sakurai, Hiroji Iwata, Yutaka J Matsuoka

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of activity pacing-related interventions on cancer-related fatigue and classification of behavior change techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Healthcare professionals' promotion of physical activity to people living with and beyond head and neck cancer: a cross-sectional survey.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Yoichi ShimizuDivision of Health Care Research, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center Japan, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5154-090X
Katsunori TsujiDivision of Health Care Research, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center Japan, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0508-6774
Eisuke OchiDivision of Health Care Research, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center Japan, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2497-0250
Ryo OkuboDivision of Health Care Research, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center Japan, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-1926
Aya KuchibaDivision of Biostatistical Research, Center for Public Health Sciences/Biostatistics Division, Center for Research Administration and Support, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6786-3527
Taichi ShimazuDivision of Behavioral Sciences, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6000-9830
Noriatsu TatematsuDepartment of Integrated Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya University, Nagoya, Japan.
Naomi SakuraiCancer Solutions Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroji IwataDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0242-4718
Yutaka J MatsuokaDivision of Health Care Research, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center Japan, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. matsuoka-psy@umin.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8690-8129
National Center for Global Health and Medicine · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPHosei University · JPJapan Cancer Society · JPJikei University School of Medicine · JPKanagawa University of Human Services · JPNagoya University · JP

Funding

National Cancer Center Japan 30-A-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA known barrier to getting breast cancer survivors (BCSs) to engage in habitual exercise is a lack of information on recommended physical activity levels provided to them by oncology care providers (OCPs). However, the actual situation in Japan remains unclear. This study sought to clarify OCPs' awareness and practice related to Japan's physical activity recommendation for BCSs and to ascertain barriers to routine information provision.

methodsWe conducted a web-based survey involving members of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society (JBCS) and the Japanese Association of Cancer Rehabilitation between Dec. 2018 and Feb. 2019.

resultsOf 10,830 members, 1,029 (9.5%) responded. Only 19.1% were aware of the details of the JBCS physical activity recommendation, and only 21.2% routinely provided physical activity information to BCSs. Factors related to being aware of the recommendation details were 1) availability of the guidelines, 2) experience reading relevant parts of the guidelines, and 3) involvement in multidisciplinary team case meetings. Barriers to routine information provision were 1) absence of perceived work responsibility, 2) underestimation of survivors' needs, 3) lack of resources, 4) lack of self-efficacy about the recommendation, and 5) poor knowledge of the recommendation.

conclusionsOnly one fifth of the OCPs routinely provided physical activity information. Barriers to provision were poor awareness, self-efficacy, and attitudes and unavailable resources. The physical activity recommendation needs to be disseminated to all OCPs and an information delivery system needs to be established for BCSs to receive appropriate information and support to promote their engagement in habitual physical activity.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsCancer SurvivorsCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHumansInternetSurvivorsBreast cancerExercise implementationOncology care providersPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID34853914
PMCPMC8857119
OpenAlexW3195319893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.