Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853873›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular and interventional radiology2022

Transjugular Portosystemic Stent Shunt: Impact of Right Atrial Pressure on Portal Venous Hemodynamics Within the First Week.

Michael Bernhard Pitton, Arndt Weinmann, Roman Kloeckner, Jens Mittler, Christian Ruckes, Christoph Düber, Gerd Otto

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular and interventional radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael Bernhard PittonDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany. michael.pitton@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5572-7763
Arndt WeinmannDepartment of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center, Langenbeckstr.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Roman KloecknerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Jens MittlerDepartment of General and Visceral Surgery and Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center, Langenbeckstr.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Christian RuckesInterdisciplinary Center for Clinical Trials (IZKS), University Medical Center, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph DüberDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Langenbeckstr.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Gerd OttoEmeritus of the Division of Transplantation Surgery, University Medical Center, Langenbeckstr.1, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePorto-systemic pressure gradient is used to prognosticate rebleeding and resolution of ascites after TIPS. This study investigates the reliability of portal pressure characteristics as quantified immediately after TIPS placement and at short-term control. PATIENTS AND

methodsPortal venous pressure (PVP) and right atrial pressure (RAP) were prospectively obtained before and after TIPS as well as ≥ 48 h after TIPS procedure. Porto-systemic pressure gradients (PSG) and pressure changes were calculated. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to predict portal hemodynamics at short-term control.

resultsThe study included 124 consecutive patients. Indications for TIPS were refractory ascites, variceal bleeding or combinations of both. Pre- and post-interventional PSG yielded 16.4 ± 5.3 mmHg and 5.9 ± 2.7 mmHg, respectively. At that time, 105/124 patients (84.7%) met the target (PSG ≤ 8 mmHg). After 4 days (median), PSG was 8.5 ± 3.5 mmHg and only 66 patients (53%) met that target. In patients exceeding the target PSG at follow-up, PVP was significantly higher and RAP was lower resulting in the increased PSG. The highly variable changes of RAP were the main contributor to different pressure gradients. In the multivariate regression analysis, PVP and RAP immediately after TIPS were predictors for PSG at short-term control with moderately predictive capacity (AUC = 0.75).

conclusionBesides the reduction of portal vein pressure, the highly variable right atrial pressure was the main contributor to different pressure gradients. Thus, immediate post-TIPS measurements do not reliably predict portal hemodynamics during follow-up. These findings need to be further investigated with respect to the corresponding clinical course of the patients.

Indexed as

Esophageal and Gastric VaricesHypertension, PortalPortasystemic Shunt, Transjugular IntrahepaticAtrial PressureGastrointestinal HemorrhageHumansLiver CirrhosisPortal VeinReproducibility of ResultsStentsLiver cirrhosisPortal hypertensionPortosystemic pressure gradient (PSG)Transjugular portosystemic stent shunt (TIPS)

Identifiers

PMID34853873
PMCPMC8716358
OpenAlexW3217155348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.