ReviewMolecular therapy oncolytics2021
Sperm protein 17 targeting for epithelialovarian cancer treatment in the eraof modern immunoengineering.
Review in Molecular therapy oncolytics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Reproductive Toxicity and Transgenerational Effects of Anesthetic Etomidate in Zebrafish: PCOS-like Ovarian Changes, Oxidative Stress, and Metabolism Disruption.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to the vague symptomatology of the disease and a lack of effective screening methods, most patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) present late in their disease. Despite advances in chemotherapeutic agents, the prognosis of these patients has uniformly been extremely poor. Although cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens induce responses in most of these patients, the patients invariably experience disease progression or relapses. In an attempt to improve the treatment outcome using a different therapeutic approach, immunotherapy was investigated nearly 20 years ago. Many tumor antigens that are potentially suitable for specific immunotherapy were identified, and many immunotherapeutic approaches were attempted. However, although some responses were observed, the results from clinical studies were generally disappointing. Recent advances in immunoengineering and successes observed among patients treated for refractory/relapsed hematologic malignancies have rekindled the interest to revisit specific cellular immunotherapy in EOC. In this review, we provide the rationale for immunotherapy of EOC, discuss the results of some of the historical studies on the use of cellular immunotherapy in EOC, outline the principles of modern immunoengineering that could be applied to treat the disease, and propose the re-evaluation of the cancer-testis antigen, Sperm protein 17, for targeting by using modern immunoengineering technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.