Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853808›Full record

ArticleRegenerative therapy2021

Three-dimensional spheroids of dedifferentiated fat cells enhance bone regeneration.

Tsukasa Yanagi, Hiroshi Kajiya, Seiichi Fujisaki, Munehisa Maeshiba, Ayako Yanagi-S, Nana Yamamoto-M, Kae Kakura, Hirofumi Kido, Jun Ohno

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Regenerative therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Research Progress on Neural Cell Culture Systems.Current neuropharmacology · 2025
    Review
  4. Preferred Orientation of Hydroxyapatite Ceramics Along theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Role of Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Assessment of the Impacts ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tsukasa YanagiOral Medicine Research Center, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1Tamura, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hiroshi KajiyaOral Medicine Research Center, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1Tamura, Fukuoka, Japan.
Seiichi FujisakiOral Medicine Research Center, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1Tamura, Fukuoka, Japan.
Munehisa MaeshibaOral Medicine Research Center, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1Tamura, Fukuoka, Japan.
Ayako Yanagi-SDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1Tamura, Fukuoka, Japan.
Nana Yamamoto-MDepartment of Odontology, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1Tamura, Fukuoka, Japan.
Kae KakuraDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1Tamura, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hirofumi KidoDepartment of Oral Rehabilitation, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1Tamura, Fukuoka, Japan.
Jun OhnoOral Medicine Research Center, Fukuoka Dental College, 2-15-1Tamura, Fukuoka, Japan.
Fukuoka Dental College · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent, self-renewing cells that are extensively used in tissue engineering. Dedifferentiated fat (DFAT) cells are derived from adipose tissues and are similar to MSCs. Three-dimensional (3D) spheroid cultures comprising MSCs mimic the biological microenvironment more accurately than two-dimensional cultures; however, it remains unclear whether DFAT cells in 3D spheroids possess high osteogenerative ability. Furthermore, it is unclear whether DFAT cells from 3D spheroids transplanted into calvarial bone defects are as effective as those from two-dimensional (2D) monolayers in promoting bone regeneration.

methodsWe compared the

resultsOsteoblast differentiation stimulated by bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) or osteogenesis-inducing medium upregulated osteogenesis-related molecules in 3D spheroid DFAT cells compared with 2D monolayer DFAT cells. BMP-2 activated phosphorylation in the canonical Smad 1/5 pathways in 3D spheroid DFAT cells but phosphorylated ERK1/2 and Smad2 in 2D monolayer DFAT cells. Regardless of osteogenic stimulation, the transplantation of 3D DFAT spheroid cells into rat calvarial defects promoted new bone formation at a greater extent than that of 2D DFAT cells.

conclusionsCompared with 2D DFAT cells, 3D DFAT spheroid cells promote osteoblast differentiation and new bone formation via canonical Smad 1/5 signaling pathways. These results indicate that transplantation of DFAT cells from 3D spheroids, but not 2D monolayers, accelerates bone healing.

Indexed as

Bone regenerationCalvarial bone defectCell transplantationDedifferentiated fat cells

Identifiers

PMID34853808
PMCPMC8604680
OpenAlexW3211438673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.