Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853763›Full record

ArticleCureus2021

Electronic Cigarette Use and the Diagnosis of Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Among United States Adults.

Katelyn Dugan, Shelby Breit, Hayrettin Okut, Elizabeth Ablah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katelyn DuganDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, USA.
Shelby BreitDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, USA.
Hayrettin OkutDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, USA.
Elizabeth AblahDepartment of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, USA.
University of Kansas · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use has many potential effects, including damage to the skin. Limited research has assessed e-cigarette use with the incidence of nonmelanoma skin cancer. The current study was conducted to determine if a relationship exists between nonmelanoma skin cancer diagnosis and e-cigarette use among US adults. Methods Data from the National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) were used to assess if a relationship exists between e-cigarette use and the diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Data within the sample adult files for years 2014 through 2018, along with the adult cancer file for the year 2015, were analyzed. Participants who reported having a diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer were included. Participants who reported never being diagnosed with any type of cancer were included as a comparison group. Results Males and those of older age were significantly more likely to be diagnosed with nonmelanoma skin cancer compared to females and younger adults. Cigarette use was significantly associated with an increased risk of nonmelanoma skin cancer. There was no relationship between e-cigarette use and diagnosis of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Conclusions Although the current study did not find an association between e-cigarette use and nonmelanoma skin cancer diagnosis, a longer study period and larger sample size may more clearly determine if an association exists.

Indexed as

e-cigarette smokingelectronic cigarettenonmelanomanonmelanoma skin cancer risktobacco adverse effects

Identifiers

PMID34853763
PMCPMC8608672
OpenAlexW3211320611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.