ReviewCureus2021
Current Trends in the Duration of Anticoagulant Therapy for Venous Thromboembolism: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.
- HERDOO2 rule to identify women with unprovoked venous thromboembolism who can discontinue anticoagulation: Can I use non-VIDAS D-dimer with 2 cut points?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2026Article
- Assessment of community pharmacists' knowledge on rivaroxaban drug and food interactions in Sudan.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Novel Plasma Proteomic Markers and Risk of Venous Thromboembolism.Circulation · 2026Article
- Determination of Patient-Specific Blood Coagulation Kinetic Parameters via Neural Networks: Toward Thrombosis Prediction in Personalized Medicine.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- The Discovery of a Novel Anticoagulant Mechanism: Factor XI Activation Inhibitors.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Smart Technology Facilitated Patient-Centered Venous Thromboembolism Management (the SmaVTE Study): Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Article
- Analysis of Postoperative Bleeding After Oral Surgery in Patients Receiving Anticoagulants: A Retrospective Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Phosphatidylserine-blocking nanoparticles inhibit thrombosis without increased bleeding in mice.Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH · 2025Article
- Massive Bilateral Pulmonary Embolism in a Healthy 37-Year-Old Male: A Case of Atypical Presentation.Cureus · 2025Article
- Naoxintong Is Involved in the Coagulation Regulation of Warfarin Through the MAPK Pathway.Pharmacogenomics and personalized medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of the VTE-PREDICT calculator on clinicians' decision making in fictional patients with venous thromboembolism: a randomized controlled trial.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024Article
- Pharmacogenomics revolutionizing cardiovascular therapeutics: A narrative review.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Perioperative Care for Bariatric Surgery.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Deletion of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinases reduces susceptibility to deep vein thrombosis in mice.Blood advances · 2024Article
- Recombinant hirudin attenuates pulmonary hypertension and thrombosis in acute pulmonary embolism rat model.PeerJ · 2024Article
- Development of a Carbon Nanotube-Enhanced FAS Bilayer Amphiphobic Coating for Biological Fluids.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Exploring the Clinical Efficacy of Venous Thromboembolism Management in Saudi Arabian Hospitals: An Insight into Patient Outcomes.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Reversal of apixaban and rivaroxaban with andexanet alfa prior to invasive or surgical procedures.Pharmacotherapy · 2022Observational
- Dilemmas in the Choice of Adequate Therapeutic Treatment in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Embolism-From Modern Recommendations to Clinical Application.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anticoagulation therapy is the first line and drug of choice for both the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism). Anticoagulation drugs, ranging from different preparations of heparin, warfarin, and newer direct oral drugs such as rivaroxaban and dabigatran, work mainly by inhibiting important factors and enzymes in the coagulation cascade by preventing fibrin formation, platelet aggregation, and clot assembly. With recurrent thrombosis and embolisms being a feared complication for many physicians treating such cases, anticoagulation is often extended beyond the initial three- to six-month acute phase after an incident of venous thromboembolism. For some groups of patients, anticoagulation needs to be offered indefinitely to decrease the risk of a recurrent thrombosis. However, this concomitantly increases obvious and dangerous adverse effects such as increased risk of hemorrhage, as the ability to clot is hindered. This tradeoff between recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding is what underscores the controversy of the clinical question: for how long should anticoagulation be administered for venous thromboembolism? This review analyzes the use of anticoagulants in different types of venous thromboembolism and remarks on current consensus and trends on the length of anticoagulation treatment. We are doing so while acknowledging that venous thromboembolism management is an active area of research that is rapidly evolving. A literature search was performed looking at recent studies on anticoagulant administration for the treatment of venous thromboembolism with a focus on varying durations and patient populations. Factors that affect clinical decisions of duration are also elucidated. The most clinically relevant anticoagulants were discussed and their effects on the risk of recurrent thrombosis and embolism, and the risk of bleeding in relation to other drugs were analyzed. Ultimately, this article discussed patterns of anticoagulant treatments duration and which patient groups are likely to benefit the most from certain durations, shedding light on the ambiguity in how physicians should approach administering anticoagulation therapy over time for a broad range of presentations of venous thromboembolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.