Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853669›Full record

ReviewJournal of healthcare engineering2021

An Overview of Supervised Machine Learning Methods and Data Analysis for COVID-19 Detection.

Aurelle Tchagna Kouanou, Thomas Mih Attia, Cyrille Feudjio, Anges Fleurio Djeumo, Adèle Ngo Mouelas, Mendel Patrice Nzogang, Christian Tchito Tchapga, Daniel Tchiotsop

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of healthcare engineering, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Deep learning-based characterization of neutrophil activation phenotypes inComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aurelle Tchagna KouanouDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Technology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0002-9735-6016
Thomas Mih AttiaDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Technology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Cyrille FeudjioDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, College of Technology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Anges Fleurio DjeumoDepartment of Training, Research Development and Innovation, InchTech's Solutions, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Adèle Ngo MouelasDepartment of Training, Research Development and Innovation, InchTech's Solutions, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Mendel Patrice NzogangFaculté de Médecine et des Sciences Biomédicales, University of Yaounde 1, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Christian Tchito TchapgaDepartment of Computer Engineering, College of Technology, University of Buea, Buea, Cameroon.
Daniel TchiotsopUnité de Recherche d'Automatique et d'informatique Appliquée (UR-AIA), IUT-FV de Bandjoun, Université de Dschang-Cameroun, BP 134, Bandjoun, Cameroon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods: Our analysis and machine learning algorithm is based on most cited two clinical datasets from the literature: one from San Raffaele Hospital Milan Italia and the other from Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein São Paulo Brasilia. The datasets were processed to select the best features that most influence the target, and it turned out that almost all of them are blood parameters. EDA (Exploratory Data Analysis) methods were applied to the datasets, and a comparative study of supervised machine learning models was done, after which the support vector machine (SVM) was selected as the one with the best performance. Results: SVM being the best performant is used as our proposed supervised machine learning algorithm. An accuracy of 99.29%, sensitivity of 92.79%, and specificity of 100% were obtained with the dataset from Kaggle (https://www.kaggle.com/einsteindata4u/covid19) after applying optimization to SVM. The same procedure and work were performed with the dataset taken from San Raffaele Hospital (https://zenodo.org/record/3886927#.YIluB5AzbMV). Once more, the SVM presented the best performance among other machine learning algorithms, and 92.86%, 93.55%, and 90.91% for accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, were obtained. Conclusion: The obtained results, when compared with others from the literature based on these same datasets, are superior, leading us to conclude that our proposed solution is reliable for the COVID-19 diagnosis.

Indexed as

COVID-19Data AnalysisAlgorithmsBrazilCOVID-19 TestingHumansSARS-CoV-2Supervised Machine LearningSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID34853669
PMCPMC8629644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.