ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology2021
Anatomical
Article in World journal of gastrointestinal oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk factors for posthepatectomy liver failure: a secondary analysis of prospective clinical trials.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic liver resection for primary and metastatic hepatobiliary cancer. A decade single-center experience on perioperative and overall survival outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Assessment prior to liver tumor resection: what a radiologist needs to know.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Review
- Clinical Application of the Right Liver Hanging Maneuver for Laparoscopic Resection of Segment 6 Hepatocellular Carcinoma.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- Anatomical versus Parenchymal-Sparing Hepatectomy for Early-Stage Perihilar Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Technical advances and application strategies in anatomical hepatic resection based on Laennec's capsule.iLIVER · 2025Review
- [Comparison of the efficacy of anatomical resection versus hepatic parenchymal preservation preference in patients with solitary small hepatocellular carcinoma and cirrhosis: a multicenter retrospective study].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Surgical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma in era of multidisciplinary strategies.International journal of clinical oncology · 2025Review
- Management of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver surgery and thermal ablations: state of the art and future perspectives.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Review
- Existing and emerging biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: relevance in staging, determination of minimal residual disease, and monitoring treatment response: a narrative review.Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2024Review
- Effect of anatomical liver resection on early postoperative recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma assessed based on a nomogram: a single-center study in China.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Consensus on the tertiary prevention of primary liver cancer.Hepatology international · 2023Article
- Comparison of Anatomic and Non-Anatomic Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- [The consensus on tertiary prevention of primary liver cancer (2022 version)].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2022Article
- Review
- Value of 3D printing technology combined with indocyanine green fluorescent navigation in complex laparoscopic hepatectomy.PloS one · 2022Article
- Expert Insights on Current Treatments for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Clinical and Molecular Approaches and Bottlenecks to Progress.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2022Review
- Progress and clinical translation in hepatocellular carcinoma of deep learning in hepatic vascular segmentation.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe long-term survival of patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) following anatomical resection (AR)
aimTo compare perioperative and long-term survival outcomes of AR and NAR for solitary HCC.
methodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library. Participants of any age and sex, who underwent liver resection, were considered following the following criteria: (1) Studies reporting AR
resultsA total of 14 studies, published between 2001 and 2020, were included in our meta-analysis, including 9444 patients who were mainly from China, Japan, and Korea. AR was performed on 4260 (44.8%) patients. The synthetic results showed that the 5-year OS [odds ratio (OR): 1.19;
conclusionAR is superior to NAR in terms of long-term outcomes. Thus, AR can be recommended as a reasonable surgical option in patients with solitary HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.