Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853499›Full record

ReviewSeminars in interventional radiology2021

The Common but Complicated Tool: Review of Embolic Materials for the Interventional Radiologist.

Shamar Young, Nassir Rostambeigi, Jafar Golzarian

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in interventional radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Use of Glue as an Embolic Agent in Trauma.Seminars in interventional radiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Renal embolization for trauma: a narrative review.Journal of trauma and injury · 2024
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shamar YoungDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Nassir RostambeigiDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Jafar GolzarianDepartment of Radiology, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota Medical Center · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Embolization is an important and widely utilized technique in interventional radiology. There are a variety of different categories and individual products which can be utilized to perform embolization. Understanding the different classes of embolic agents, the important features of each of these classes including strengths and limitations, and the variation in individual products within the classes is critical for interventional radiologist to practice safely and effectively. This article reviews the different kinds of embolics and relays some of the pertinent physical and chemical properties of individual products which should be considered when determining which embolic to select for a given purpose.

Indexed as

devicesembolizationinterventional radiologytechniques

Identifiers

PMID34853499
PMCPMC8612830
OpenAlexW3217760391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.