Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853477›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

Predation increases multiple components of microbial diversity in activated sludge communities.

Alfred Burian, Daisy Pinn, Ignacio Peralta-Maraver, Michael Sweet, Quentin Mauvisseau, Ozge Eyice, Mark Bulling, Till Röthig, Pavel Kratina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Stone MorokoBiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biotechnology revival:Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alfred BurianAquatic Research Facility, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, UK. flinserl@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4928-0897
Daisy PinnSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Ignacio Peralta-MaraverDepartment of Ecology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3467-7664
Michael SweetAquatic Research Facility, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4983-8333
Quentin MauvisseauAquatic Research Facility, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, UK.
Ozge EyiceSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5998-3959
Mark BullingAquatic Research Facility, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, UK.
Till RöthigAquatic Research Facility, Environmental Sustainability Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6359-8589
Pavel KratinaSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. p.kratina@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9144-7937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protozoan predators form an essential component of activated sludge communities that is tightly linked to wastewater treatment efficiency. Nonetheless, very little is known how protozoan predation is channelled via bacterial communities to affect ecosystem functioning. Therefore, we experimentally manipulated protozoan predation pressure in activated-sludge communities to determine its impacts on microbial diversity, composition and putative functionality. Different components of bacterial diversity such as taxa richness, evenness, genetic diversity and beta diversity all responded strongly and positively to high protozoan predation pressure. These responses were non-linear and levelled off at higher levels of predation pressure, supporting predictions of hump-shaped relationships between predation pressure and prey diversity. In contrast to predation intensity, the impact of predator diversity had both positive (taxa richness) and negative (evenness and phylogenetic distinctiveness) effects on bacterial diversity. Furthermore, predation shaped the structure of bacterial communities. Reduction in top-down control negatively affected the majority of taxa that are generally associated with increased treatment efficiency, compromising particularly the potential for nitrogen removal. Consequently, our findings highlight responses of bacterial diversity and community composition as two distinct mechanisms linking protozoan predation with ecosystem functioning in activated sludge communities.

Indexed as

EcosystemPredatory BehaviorAnimalsBacteriaPhylogenySewageSewage

Identifiers

PMID34853477
PMCPMC8941047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.