Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853436›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2023

Diagnostic and therapeutic workup of male infertility: results from a Delphi consensus panel.

Luca Boeri, Paolo Capogrosso, Ilaria Ortensi, Carlos Miacola, Tommaso Cai, Paolo Verze, Andrea Salonia, Bruno Giammusso, Alessandro Palmieri

Erratum issuedAbstract readConsensus Statement
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of impotence research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Luca BoeriDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy. dr.lucaboeri@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0040-784X
Paolo CapogrossoDepartment of Urology and Andrology, Ospedale di Circolo and Macchi Foundation, Varese, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2347-9504
Ilaria OrtensiLaboratory Altamedica, Rome, Italy.
Carlos MiacolaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Tommaso CaiDepartment of Urology, Santa Chiara Regional Hospital, Trento, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7234-3526
Paolo VerzeUrology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery, Dentistry "Scuola Medica Salernitana", University of Salerno, Baronissi, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3789-8227
Andrea SaloniaDivision of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0595-7165
Bruno GiammussoUrology Clinic, Policlinic "Morgagni", Catania, Italy.
Alessandro PalmieriDepartment of Urology, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male factor infertility (MFI) is a rising issue worldwide with significant socioeconomic costs and negative psychological consequences for the couple. Current guidelines provide recommendations for its diagnosis and treatment but several gaps in the management of MFI are encountered in clinical practice due to the lack of available evidence in published literature. Uncertainty in the management of MFI cases leads to a high degree of variability in therapeutic approaches. We planned a Delphi consensus method to provide insights and help bridge the gaps that separate clinical guidelines from real-world practice. The Advisory Board collected 41 statements on debated topics in the management of MFI, each including multiple items designed as a 5-point Likert scale. The questionnaire was sent by e-mail to a panel of Italian experts for a first round of voting; members of the panel were later invited to a second round of voting, preceded by discussion of the "hot topics" identified in the first round. At both rounds of the Delphi consensus 68 experts participated to the voting process. After the first round 25 statements were identified as hot topics, and these underwent the second round of voting. Consensus was reached on many, but not all cases, leaving vagueness on few debated topics where decisions are unsupported by clinical studies or driven by controversial results. In conclusion, indications emerging from this large panel of experts may help guide the management of male factor infertility in clinical practice. Studies are needed to address unanswered questions left by cases for whom no consensus was reached.

Indexed as

InfertilityDelphi TechniqueHumansItalyMaleSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.