Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853374›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Long-term specific IgG response to SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein in recovered COVID-19 patients.

Jira Chansaenroj, Ritthideach Yorsaeng, Nawarat Posuwan, Jiratchaya Puenpa, Nasamon Wanlapakorn, Natthinee Sudhinaraset, Manit Sripramote, Piti Chalongviriyalert, Supunee Jirajariyavej, Phatharaporn Kiatpanabhikul and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jira ChansaenrojCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ritthideach YorsaengCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nawarat PosuwanCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jiratchaya PuenpaCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nasamon WanlapakornCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natthinee SudhinarasetCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Manit SripramoteMedical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piti ChalongviriyalertMedical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Supunee JirajariyavejTaksin Hospital, Medical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phatharaporn KiatpanabhikulCharoenkrung Pracharak Hospital, Medical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jatuporn SaiyarinKlang General Hospital, Medical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chulikorn SoudonSirindhorn Hospital, Medical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Orawan ThienfaideeRatchaphiphat Hospital, Medical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thitisan Palakawong Na AyuthayaPublic Health Center 28, Health Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chantapat BrukesawanPublic Health Center 26, Health Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chintana ChirathawornCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Duangnapa IntharasongkrohNational Blood Center, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Dootchai ChaiwanichsiriNational Blood Center, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mila IssarasongkhramInstitute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rungrueng KitphatiInstitute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anek MungaomklangInstitute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention, Department of Disease Control, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pijaya NagavajaraOffice of the Permanent Secretary for the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yong PoovorawanCenter of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. yong.p@chula.ac.th.
Bangkok Metropolitan Administration · THChulalongkorn University · THMinistry of Public Health · THThai Red Cross Society · THCharoenkrung Pracharak Hospital · TH

Funding

Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology of Chulalongkorn University/King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital GCE 59-009-30-005Research Chair Grant from the National Science and Technology Development Agency P-15-50004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study monitored the long-term immune response to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV)-2 infection in patients who had recovered from coronavirus disease (COVID)-19. Anti-nucleocapsid immunoglobulin G (anti-N IgG) titer in serum samples collected at a single (N = 302) or multiple time points (N = 229) 3-12 months after COVID-19 symptom onset or SARS-CoV-2 detection in respiratory specimens was measured by semiquantitative chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. The 531 patients (966 specimens) were classified according to the presence or absence of pneumonia symptoms. Anti N IgG was detected in 87.5% of patients (328/375) at 3 months, 38.6% (93/241) at 6 months, 23.7% (49/207) at 9 months, and 26.6% (38/143) at 12 months. The anti-N IgG seropositivity rate was significantly lower at 6, 9, and 12 months than at 3 months (P < 0.01) and was higher in the pneumonia group than in the non-pneumonia/asymptomatic group at 6 months (P < 0.01), 9 months (P = 0.04), and 12 months (P = 0.04). The rate started to decline 6-12 months after symptom onset. Anti-N IgG sample/cutoff index was positively correlated with age (r = 0.192, P < 0.01) but negatively correlated with interval between symptom onset and blood sampling (r =  - 0.567, P < 0.01). These findings can guide vaccine strategies in recovered COVID-19 patients.

Indexed as

AdultAntibodies, ViralCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsCOVID-19FemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GMaleMiddle AgedPhosphoproteinsPneumoniaRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2ThailandYoung AdultAntibodies, ViralCoronavirus Nucleocapsid ProteinsImmunoglobulin Gnucleocapsid phosphoprotein, SARS-CoV-2Phosphoproteins

Identifiers

PMID34853374
PMCPMC8636620
OpenAlexW3182429467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.