ArticleScientific reports2021
Identifying occult bladder outlet obstruction in women with detrusor-underactivity-like urodynamic profiles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Therapeutic efficacy and predictive factors for treatment outcomes of transurethral incision of the bladder neck in women with voiding dysfunction due to an underactive bladder.International urology and nephrology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic clues for low-pressure female bladder outflow obstruction overlooked by conventional urodynamics.World journal of urology · 2026Article
- Changes of bladder urodynamics after combined pelvic floor muscle training and intravaginal stimulation in women with stress urinary incontinence: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Analysis of clinical efficacy of sacral magnetic stimulation for the treatment of detrusor underactivity.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Prevalence and predictors of detrusor underactivity and bladder outlet obstruction in women with lower urinary tract symptoms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Diagnoses and Treatment Recommendations-Interrater Reliability of Uroflowmetry in People with Multiple Sclerosis.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Botulinum Toxin A Injection for Autonomic Dysreflexia-Detrusor Injection or Urethral Sphincter Injection?Toxins · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byGeriatrics.2022
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Voiding dysfunction can result from detrusor underactivity (DU), bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), or both. Conceptually, women with high-pressure low-flow urodynamic profiles are diagnosed with BOO without DU. However, the possibility of BOO is often neglected in women with DU-like (low-pressure low-flow) urodynamic (UDS) profiles. By reviewing the videourodynamic studies (VUDS) of 1678 women, our study identified the key factors suggesting urodynamic BOO (determined by radiographic evidence of obstruction) in women with DU-like UDS profiles (Pdet.Qmax < 20 cmH2O and Qmax < 15 mL/s). In 355 women with DU-like UDS profiles, there were 70 (19.7%) with BOO and 285 (80.3%) without BOO. The BOO group had predominantly obstructive symptoms. The BOO group showed significantly decreased bladder sensation, lower detrusor pressure (Pdet.Qmax), lower flow rate (Qmax), smaller voided volume, and larger post-voiding residual (PVR) compared to the non-BOO group. In multivariate analysis, volume at first sensation, Qmax, PVR, and detrusor overactivity (DO) remained independent factors for BOO. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) areas for the parameters were largest for PVR (area = 0.786) and Qmax (area = 0.742). The best cut-off points were 220 mL for PVR and 4 mL/s for Qmax. Our findings provide simple indicators for BOO in women with DU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.