Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853138›Full record

ArticleSaudi medical journal2021

Invoking the influence of emotion in central auditory processing to improve the treatment of speech impairments.

Safa Alqudah, Maha Zaitoun, Sara Alqudah

Erratum issuedOpen access · diamondAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 77% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Safa AlqudahFrom the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (Alqudah, Zaitoun), Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology; and from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory (Alqudah), King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan.
Maha ZaitounFrom the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (Alqudah, Zaitoun), Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology; and from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory (Alqudah), King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan.
Sara AlqudahFrom the Department of Rehabilitation Sciences (Alqudah, Zaitoun), Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, Jordan University of Science and Technology; and from the Department of Pathology and Laboratory (Alqudah), King Abdullah University Hospital, Irbid, Jordan.
Jordan University of Science and Technology · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the benefits of invoking unconscious sentiment to improve the treatment of stuttering and misarticulation.

methodsThis cross-sectional study of 80 participants with speech issues (44 patients with misarticulation and 36 with stuttering) who underwent comprehensive speech and hearing evaluations to confirm and diagnose speech difficulties. Speech and language pathologists then calculated either the percentage of correctly pronounce sounds in misarticulation cases or stuttering severity index-4 scores in cases of stuttering following the use of therapeutic stimuli recorded with familiar and non-familiar voices of similar linguistic and phonetic complexity. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to compare the data collected following the use of familiar and unfamiliar stimuli.

resultsThe analysis showed that the number of dysfluencies in cases of stuttering were significantly fewer when employing familiar voices than unfamiliar voices (3% errors vs 12% errors; Z= -5.16

Indexed as

SpeechStutteringAuditory PerceptionCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsHumansarticulationcentral auditory systememotionsstuttering

Identifiers

PMID34853138
PMCPMC9149759
OpenAlexW3216935290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.