Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34853084›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Respiration, Heartbeat, and Conscious Tactile Perception.

Martin Grund, Esra Al, Marc Pabst, Alice Dabbagh, Tilman Stephani, Till Nierhaus, Michael Gaebler, Arno Villringer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Guidelines for rigor and reproducibility of heart rate variability within human cardiovascular research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Illusory cold desensitizes touch.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Martin GrundDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany mgrund@cbs.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-8506
Esra AlDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Marc PabstDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Alice DabbaghDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany.
Tilman StephaniDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3323-3874
Till NierhausDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0906-592X
Michael GaeblerDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4442-5778
Arno VillringerDepartment of Neurology, Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Leipzig 04103, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that timing of sensory stimulation during the cardiac cycle interacts with perception. Given the natural coupling of respiration and cardiac activity, we investigated here their joint effects on tactile perception. Forty-one healthy female and male human participants reported conscious perception of finger near-threshold electrical pulses (33% null trials) and decision confidence while electrocardiography, respiratory activity, and finger photoplethysmography were recorded. Participants adapted their respiratory cycle to expected stimulus onsets to preferentially occur during late inspiration/early expiration. This closely matched heart rate variation (sinus arrhythmia) across the respiratory cycle such that most frequent stimulation onsets occurred during the period of highest heart rate probably indicating highest alertness and cortical excitability. Tactile detection rate was highest during the first quadrant after expiration onset. Interindividually, stronger respiratory phase-locking to the task was associated with higher detection rates. Regarding the cardiac cycle, we confirmed previous findings that tactile detection rate was higher during diastole than systole and newly specified its minimum at 250-300 ms after the R-peak corresponding to the pulse wave arrival in the finger. Expectation of stimulation induced a transient heart deceleration which was more pronounced for unconfident decision ratings. Interindividually, stronger poststimulus modulations of heart rate were linked to higher detection rates. In summary, we demonstrate how tuning to the respiratory cycle and integration of respiratory-cardiac signals are used to optimize performance of a tactile detection task.

Indexed as

AdultConsciousnessDecision MakingEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryFemaleHeart RateHumansMalePhotic StimulationPhysical StimulationRespiratory MechanicsTouch PerceptionYoung Adultcardiac cycleelectrocardiograminteroceptionphotoplethysmographyrespirationtactile perception

Identifiers

PMID34853084
PMCPMC8805629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.