Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852839›Full record

Trial reportInternational breastfeeding journal2021

Implementing a successful proactive telephone breastfeeding peer support intervention: volunteer recruitment, training, and intervention delivery in the RUBY randomised controlled trial.

Heather A Grimes, Helen L McLachlan, Della A Forster, Fiona McLardie-Hore, Kate Mortensen, Touran Shafiei

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International breastfeeding journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather A GrimesJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia. h.grimes@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8753-590X
Helen L McLachlanJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Della A ForsterJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Fiona McLardie-HoreJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
Kate MortensenAustralian Breastfeeding Association, Melbourne, Australia.
Touran ShafieiJudith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.
La Trobe University · AURoyal Women's Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe RUBY randomised controlled trial demonstrated the benefit of proactive telephone peer support in promoting breastfeeding continuation in a setting with high breastfeeding initiation, where typically this is difficult to achieve. This paper describes the implementation and delivery of the peer support intervention with a focus on recruitment, training, and support of peer volunteers, and includes a description of the key components of the calls.

methodsData collection occurred between December 2012 and June 2016 in Melbourne, Australia. Volunteers completed enrolment forms at the training session and recorded data related to each call in a Call Log maintained for each mother supported. Data were summarised using descriptive statistics and responses to open-ended questions analysed using content analysis.

resultsA total of 693 women expressed interest in the peer support role, with 246 completing training, that is, 95% of whom supported at least one mother. Each supported a mean of two mothers (range 1 to 11). Training session topics included respecting individual values, using positive language, confidence building, active listening, empathetic support, and normal baby behaviour. There were 518 periods of support where at least one call was made between a volunteer and a mother to whom she was allocated. Of the 518 periods of support, 359 Call Logs (69%) were returned. The 359 call logs recorded a total of 2398 calls between peers and mothers. Call length median duration was 12 min (range 1 to 111 min). Volunteers perceived the most valued aspects of the calls were the provsion of 'general emotional support' (51%) and 'general information/discussion about breastfeeding' (44%). During the first call, mothers raised questions about 'nipple pain/ damage' (24%) and 'general breastfeeding information' (23%). At ≥12 weeks postpartum, issues raised related to 'normal infant behaviour' (22%), 'feed frequency' (16%), and 'general breastfeeding information' (15%). Volunteers referred women to other resources during 28% of calls, most commonly to the Australian Breastfeeding Association.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that the RUBY trial was feasible and sustainable in terms of recruiting volunteers who were willing to participate in training and who proceeded to provide peer support. Call content was responsive to the evolving breastfeeding information needs of mothers and the provision of emotional support was perceived by volunteers to be important.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN 12612001024831 .

Indexed as

Breast FeedingSocial SupportAustraliaFemaleHumansInfantTelephoneVolunteersBreastfeedingImplementationPeer supportTelephone support

Identifiers

PMID34852839
PMCPMC8638340
OpenAlexW3216464117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.