Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852789›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2021

Development of Chinese mental health first aid guidelines for assisting a person affected by a traumatic event: a Delphi expert consensus study.

Yan Wang, Wenjing Li, Shurong Lu, Anthony F Jorm, Brian Oldenburg, Yanling He, Nicola Reavley

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan WangShanghai Mental Health Centre, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
Wenjing LiCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Shurong LuJiangsu Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.
Anthony F JormCentre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Brian OldenburgThe Nossal Institute for Global Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Yanling He *Shanghai Mental Health Centre, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 600 Wan Ping Nan Road, Shanghai, 200030, China. heyl2001@163.com.
Nicola Reavley *Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople who experience traumatic events have an increased risk of developing a range of mental disorders. Appropriate early support from people in a person's social network may help to prevent the onset of a mental disorder or minimize its severity. Mental health first aid guidelines for assisting people who have experienced traumatic events have been developed for high-income English-speaking countries. However, they may not be appropriate for use in China due to cultural and health care system differences. The aim of this study was to develop culturally appropriate guidelines for people providing mental health first aid to people affected by traumatic events in China.

methodsA Delphi expert consensus study was conducted with two panels of experts in mainland China. Experts recruited to the panels included 32 professionals with expertise in the treatment of people affected by traumatic events and 31 people with lived experience of trauma or their carers. Panel members were sent a Chinese translation of the questionnaire used for developing English-language mental health first aid guidelines. This contained 168 items describing how to help people experiencing a potentially traumatic event. Panelists were asked to rate the importance of each statement for inclusion in the Chinese guidelines. They were also encouraged to suggest any additional statements that were not included in the original questionnaire. Statements were accepted for inclusion in the adapted guidelines if they were endorsed by at least 80% of each panel as very important or important.

resultsConsensus was achieved after three survey rounds on 134 statements for inclusion in the adapted guidelines for China, with 127 adopted from the guidelines for English-speaking countries and 7 new items from the comments of panelists.

conclusionsWhile many of the statements are similar to the guidelines for English-speaking countries, the panelists adapted the guidelines to China's context, including more detailed actions on how to discuss trauma and to help the person. These guidelines will be used to form the basis of a Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training course for China, aimed at educating the public in providing support and advice to a person who is experiencing a potentially traumatic event. Further research is needed to investigate the use of the guidelines by the Chinese public and the implementation of MHFA training in appropriate settings in China.

Indexed as

First AidMental HealthConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansLanguageSurveys and QuestionnairesChinaCultural adaptationDelphi studyMental health first aidTrauma

Identifiers

PMID34852789
PMCPMC8633911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.