Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852686›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2022

'The System is Not Set up for the Benefit of Women': Women's Experiences of Decision-Making During Pregnancy and Birth in Ireland.

Susann Huschke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Women's and Provider's Moral Reasoning About the Permissibility of Coercion in Birth: A Descriptive Ethics Study.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Rethinking advanced motherhood: a new ethical narrative.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Exploring the Application of Intersectionality as a Path toward Equity in Perinatal Health: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Susann HuschkePublic and Patient Involvement (PPI) Research Unit (School of Medicine) and Health Research Institute, 8808University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-3070-5162

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, I draw on in-depth qualitative interviews with 23 women, conducted in 2019/2020, focusing on their involvement in decision-making during pregnancy and birth. The study is located in Ireland, where comparably progressive national policies regarding informed choice in labour and birth clash with the day-to-day reality of a heavily medicalised, paternalistic maternity care system. I represent the subjective experiences of a diverse group of women through in-depth interview excerpts. In my analysis, I move beyond describing

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesObstetricsDecision MakingFemaleHumansIrelandParturitionPregnancyQualitative Researchchildbirthcommunicationdecision makingdoctor-patientempowermentfeminismgenderinformed choice autonomynurse-patientpowerpregnancyreproduction

Identifiers

PMID34852686
PMCPMC8727824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.