Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852625›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021

A causal and talker-independent speaker separation/dereverberation deep learning algorithm: Cost associated with conversion to real-time capable operation.

Eric W Healy, Hassan Taherian, Eric M Johnson, DeLiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Progress made in the efficacy and viability of deep-learning-based noise reduction.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology and the Communication Sciences.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric W HealyDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Hassan TaherianDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
Eric M JohnsonDepartment of Speech and Hearing Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.
DeLiang WangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA.

Funding

Speech segregation to improve intelligility of reverberant-noisy speechR01DC012048 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WILLIAMSON, DONALD · 2013 to 2022
$3.3M
Improving intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listenersR01DC015521 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI HEALY, ERIC W · 2016 to 2020
$1.6M
Real-time deep learning to improve speech intelligibility in noiseF32DC019314 · NIDCD · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JOHNSON, ERIC MARTIN · 2020 to 2022
$149k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC019314NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012048NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC015521
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fundamental requirement for real-time operation of a speech-processing algorithm is causality-that it operate without utilizing future time frames. In the present study, the performance of a fully causal deep computational auditory scene analysis algorithm was assessed. Target sentences were isolated from complex interference consisting of an interfering talker and concurrent room reverberation. The talker- and corpus/channel-independent model used Dense-UNet and temporal convolutional networks and estimated both magnitude and phase of the target speech. It was found that mean algorithm benefit was significant in every condition. Mean benefit for hearing-impaired (HI) listeners across all conditions was 46.4 percentage points. The cost of converting the algorithm to causal processing was also assessed by comparing to a prior non-causal version. Intelligibility decrements for HI and normal-hearing listeners from non-causal to causal processing were present in most but not all conditions, and these decrements were statistically significant in half of the conditions tested-those representing the greater levels of complex interference. Although a cost associated with causal processing was present in most conditions, it may be considered modest relative to the overall level of benefit.

Indexed as

Deep LearningHearing Loss, SensorineuralSpeech PerceptionAlgorithmsHumansSpeech Intelligibility

Identifiers

PMID34852625
PMCPMC8612765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.