ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021
A causal and talker-independent speaker separation/dereverberation deep learning algorithm: Cost associated with conversion to real-time capable operation.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scoping review of deep learning research illuminates artificial intelligence chasm in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Improved tactile speech robustness to background noise with a dual-path recurrent neural network noise-reduction method.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- The Application of Time-Frequency Masking To Improve Intelligibility of Dysarthric Speech in Background Noise.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Progress made in the efficacy and viability of deep-learning-based noise reduction.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
- Harnessing the Power of Artificial Intelligence in Otolaryngology and the Communication Sciences.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2022Review
- Objective Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Noise Reduction Algorithm for Hearing Aids Under Diverse Fitting and Listening Conditions.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The fundamental requirement for real-time operation of a speech-processing algorithm is causality-that it operate without utilizing future time frames. In the present study, the performance of a fully causal deep computational auditory scene analysis algorithm was assessed. Target sentences were isolated from complex interference consisting of an interfering talker and concurrent room reverberation. The talker- and corpus/channel-independent model used Dense-UNet and temporal convolutional networks and estimated both magnitude and phase of the target speech. It was found that mean algorithm benefit was significant in every condition. Mean benefit for hearing-impaired (HI) listeners across all conditions was 46.4 percentage points. The cost of converting the algorithm to causal processing was also assessed by comparing to a prior non-causal version. Intelligibility decrements for HI and normal-hearing listeners from non-causal to causal processing were present in most but not all conditions, and these decrements were statistically significant in half of the conditions tested-those representing the greater levels of complex interference. Although a cost associated with causal processing was present in most conditions, it may be considered modest relative to the overall level of benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.