ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2021
Modeling the effects of age and hearing loss on concurrent vowel scores.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A difference in fundamental frequency (F0) between two vowels is an important segregation cue prior to identifying concurrent vowels. To understand the effects of this cue on identification due to age and hearing loss, Chintanpalli, Ahlstrom, and Dubno [(2016). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 140, 4142-4153] collected concurrent vowel scores across F0 differences for younger adults with normal hearing (YNH), older adults with normal hearing (ONH), and older adults with hearing loss (OHI). The current modeling study predicts these concurrent vowel scores to understand age and hearing loss effects. The YNH model cascaded the temporal responses of an auditory-nerve model from Bruce, Efrani, and Zilany [(2018). Hear. Res. 360, 40-45] with a modified F0-guided segregation algorithm from Meddis and Hewitt [(1992). J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91, 233-245] to predict concurrent vowel scores. The ONH model included endocochlear-potential loss, while the OHI model also included hair cell damage; however, both models incorporated cochlear synaptopathy, with a larger effect for OHI. Compared with the YNH model, concurrent vowel scores were reduced across F0 differences for ONH and OHI models, with the lowest scores for OHI. These patterns successfully captured the age and hearing loss effects in the concurrent-vowel data. The predictions suggest that the inability to utilize an F0-guided segregation cue, resulting from peripheral changes, may reduce scores for ONH and OHI listeners.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.