Trial reportTransplantation and cellular therapy2022
Impact of Bridging Chemotherapy on Clinical Outcomes of CD19-Specific CAR T Cell Therapy in Children/Young Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.
Trial report in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01860937 (A Phase I Trial of T-Lymphocytes Genetically Targeted to the B-Cell Specific Antigen CD19 in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Relapsed B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase I Trial of T-Lymphocytes Genetically Targeted to the B-Cell Specific Antigen CD19 in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Relapsed B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immunotherapy for the treatment of acute leukemia, version 2.0.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2026Guideline
- Long-term response to autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cells in relapsed or refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer gene therapy · 2023Pooled it
- The evolving landscape of CAR T cell therapy in children and young adults with B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Molecular therapy. Oncology · 2026Review
- Locally manufacturedHaematologica · 2026Article
- Low Peripheral Blood Counts and Elevated Proinflammatory Cytokines Signal a Poor CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Response in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2025Article
- CAR-T Cell Therapy for Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Where Do We Stand Now?Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Multinational retrospective analysis of bridging therapy prior to chimeric antigen receptor t cells for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children and young adults.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025Article
- Impact of inotuzumab ozogamicin as bridging therapy and tumor burden in CAR-T therapy for B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Prognostic significance of immune reconstitution following CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphoma.HemaSphere · 2025Article
- Approaches for bridging therapy prior to chimeric antigen receptor T cells for relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic B-lineage leukemia in children and young adults.Haematologica · 2024Review
- Comparison of infectious complications with BCMA-directed therapies in multiple myeloma.Blood cancer journal · 2024Article
- Bridging therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel for large B-cell lymphoma: results from the US Lymphoma CAR-T Consortium.Blood advances · 2024Article
- CAR-T cell manufacturing: Major process parameters and next-generation strategies.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2024Review
- CAR T-Cells for the Treatment of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- INSPIRED Symposium Part 1: Clinical Variables Associated with Improved Outcomes for Children and Young Adults treated with Chimeric Antigen Receptor T cells for B cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2023Review
- Nivolumab combined with brentuximab vedotin for R/R primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma: a 3-year follow-up.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of Resistance and Treatment of Relapse after CAR T-cell Therapy for Large B-cell Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma.Transplantation and cellular therapy · 2023Review
- CD19 CAR T cells are an effective therapy for posttransplant relapse in patients with B-lineage ALL: real-world data from Germany.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Review
- Impact of disease burden and late loss of B cell aplasia on the risk of relapse after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T Cell (Tisagenlecleucel) infusion in pediatric and young adult patients with relapse/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: role of B-cell monitoring.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells achieve response and durable remission in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B cell malignancies. Following collection of patient T cells, chemotherapy ("bridging chemotherapy") is utilized during the manufacture of CAR T cells. However, the optimal bridging chemotherapy has yet to be defined. Our objective in this study was to report clinical outcomes following bridging chemotherapy in a cohort of pediatric/young adult patients with R/R B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) treated with CAR T cell therapy. This retrospective study included patients enrolled on clinical trial NCT01860937 or referred to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for commercial CAR T cell therapy (tisagenlecleucel). Bridging chemotherapy (given after T cell collection and before CAR T cell infusion) was defined as high intensity if myelosuppression was expected for >7 days. Outcome comparison analyses were performed in high-intensity versus low-intensity bridging chemotherapy, 1 cycle versus ≥2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy, disease burden at the start of bridging chemotherapy, disease burden at the start of bridging chemotherapy with chemotherapy intensity, tumor debulking by bridging chemotherapy, and disease burden pre-lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) for CAR T cell treatment. The outcomes of this analysis showed that the incidence of grade ≥3 infection was significantly higher (94% versus 56%; P = .019) and overall survival (OS) was significantly lower (hazard ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.39 to 9.97; P = .006) in patients who received ≥2 cycles versus 1 cycle of bridging chemotherapy. No difference in incidence was found for cytokine release syndrome (P > .99) or neurotoxicity/immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (P = .70). Disease burden at the start of bridging chemotherapy, disease burden prior to LDC, and tumor debulking by bridging chemotherapy also did not significantly affect outcomes after CAR T cell therapy in this cohort. In this study, patients receiving ≥2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had higher rates of infection and lower OS but no difference in CAR-specific toxicity. Clinicians should carefully consider the use of additional cycles of chemotherapy during the bridging period as it delays treatment with CAR T cells and increases the risk of infectious complications. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.