Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852305›Full record

Trial reportTransplantation and cellular therapy2022

Impact of Bridging Chemotherapy on Clinical Outcomes of CD19-Specific CAR T Cell Therapy in Children/Young Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Sanam Shahid, Kavitha Ramaswamy, Jessica Flynn, Audrey Mauguen, Karlo Perica, Jae H Park, Christopher J Forlenza, Neerav N Shukla, Peter G Steinherz, Steven P Margossian and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Transplantation and cellular therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01860937 (A Phase I Trial of T-Lymphocytes Genetically Targeted to the B-Cell Specific Antigen CD19 in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Relapsed B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia), which is not on this map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01860937 phase1active not recruitingnot on this map

A Phase I Trial of T-Lymphocytes Genetically Targeted to the B-Cell Specific Antigen CD19 in Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Relapsed B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

TypeinterventionalSponsorMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterRan2013 to 2027Enrolled23ConditionsRelapsed B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaArmsleukapheresis or collection of PBMCs, cyclophosphamide based chemotherapy regimens, modified T cells
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Locally manufacturedHaematologica · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sanam ShahidDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kavitha RamaswamyDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jessica FlynnDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Audrey MauguenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Karlo PericaDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jae H ParkDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Christopher J ForlenzaDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Neerav N ShuklaDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Peter G SteinherzDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Steven P MargossianDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jaap Jan BoelensDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Nancy A KernanDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kevin J CurranDepartment of Pediatrics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York. Electronic address: currank@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USDana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells achieve response and durable remission in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) B cell malignancies. Following collection of patient T cells, chemotherapy ("bridging chemotherapy") is utilized during the manufacture of CAR T cells. However, the optimal bridging chemotherapy has yet to be defined. Our objective in this study was to report clinical outcomes following bridging chemotherapy in a cohort of pediatric/young adult patients with R/R B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL) treated with CAR T cell therapy. This retrospective study included patients enrolled on clinical trial NCT01860937 or referred to Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for commercial CAR T cell therapy (tisagenlecleucel). Bridging chemotherapy (given after T cell collection and before CAR T cell infusion) was defined as high intensity if myelosuppression was expected for >7 days. Outcome comparison analyses were performed in high-intensity versus low-intensity bridging chemotherapy, 1 cycle versus ≥2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy, disease burden at the start of bridging chemotherapy, disease burden at the start of bridging chemotherapy with chemotherapy intensity, tumor debulking by bridging chemotherapy, and disease burden pre-lymphodepleting chemotherapy (LDC) for CAR T cell treatment. The outcomes of this analysis showed that the incidence of grade ≥3 infection was significantly higher (94% versus 56%; P = .019) and overall survival (OS) was significantly lower (hazard ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.39 to 9.97; P = .006) in patients who received ≥2 cycles versus 1 cycle of bridging chemotherapy. No difference in incidence was found for cytokine release syndrome (P > .99) or neurotoxicity/immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (P = .70). Disease burden at the start of bridging chemotherapy, disease burden prior to LDC, and tumor debulking by bridging chemotherapy also did not significantly affect outcomes after CAR T cell therapy in this cohort. In this study, patients receiving ≥2 cycles of bridging chemotherapy had higher rates of infection and lower OS but no difference in CAR-specific toxicity. Clinicians should carefully consider the use of additional cycles of chemotherapy during the bridging period as it delays treatment with CAR T cells and increases the risk of infectious complications. © 2021 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Indexed as

Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-LymphomaReceptors, Chimeric AntigenAntigens, CD19ChildHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveRecurrenceRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAntigens, CD19Receptors, Chimeric AntigenB cell acute lymphoblastic leukemiaBridging chemotherapyCAR T cell therapyCD19 antigenImmunotherapyTisagenlecleucel

Identifiers

PMID34852305
PMCPMC9361393
OpenAlexW3215054220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.