ArticleNeuroImage2021
Spatial sampling of MEG and EEG based on generalized spatial-frequency analysis and optimal design.
Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Spatial-Jitter Model for Magnetoencephalography Sensor Arrays.IEEE transactions on medical imaging · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Optically Pumped Magnetometers in Detecting Activity From the Cerebellar Cortex.Human brain mapping · 2026Article
- Forward-Projected Cortical Eigenmodes Provide an Efficient Sensor-Space Representation of Resting-State EEG.Brain topography · 2026Article
- Enhanced Neural Decoding With Optically Pumped Magnetometer MEG Using Multivariate Pattern Analysis.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2026Article
- Distance of bipolar re-referencing imparts nonlinear frequency-specific influences on intracranial recording signal measurements.Journal of neural engineering · 2025Article
- Qualitative and Quantitative Comparative Analysis of Common Normal Variants and Physiological Artifacts in MEG and EEG.Brain topography · 2025Article
- Head-Specific Spatial Spectra of Electroencephalography Explained: A Sphara and BEM Investigation.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Optimization and Analysis of Tangential Component Orientations in OPM-MEG Sensor Array.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025Review
- Assessing the stability of evoked, induced, and passive MEG responses for repeat testing with optically pumped magnetometers.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Volume conductor models for magnetospinography.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biplanar Nulling Coil System for OPM-MEG Using Printed Circuit Boards.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Cortical parcellation optimized for magnetoencephalography with a clustering technique.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A fully integrated whole-head helium OPM MEG: a performance assessment compared to cryogenic MEG.Frontiers in medical technology · 2025Article
- [Fontanel compensation for infant electroencephalography forward modeling method].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2024Article
- Four-channel optically pumped magnetometer for a magnetoencephalography sensor array.Optics express · 2024Article
- Electrocorticographic Activation Patterns of Electroencephalographic Microstates.Brain topography · 2024Article
- Evaluating and benchmarking the EEG signal quality of high-density, dry MXene-based electrode arrays against gelled Ag/AgCl electrodes.Journal of neural engineering · 2024Article
- Recent trends in multiple metrics and multimodal analysis for neural activity and pupillometry.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Single-trial classification of evoked responses to auditory tones using OPM- and SQUID-MEG.Journal of neural engineering · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In this paper, we analyze spatial sampling of electro- (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG), where the electric or magnetic field is typically sampled on a curved surface such as the scalp. By simulating fields originating from a representative adult-male head, we study the spatial-frequency content in EEG as well as in on- and off-scalp MEG. This analysis suggests that on-scalp MEG, off-scalp MEG and EEG can benefit from up to 280, 90 and 110 spatial samples, respectively. In addition, we suggest a new approach to obtain sensor locations that are optimal with respect to prior assumptions. The approach also allows to control, e.g., the uniformity of the sensor locations. Based on our simulations, we argue that for a low number of spatial samples, model-informed non-uniform sampling can be beneficial. For a large number of samples, uniform sampling grids yield nearly the same total information as the model-informed grids.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.