Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852276›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2021

Not all voxels are created equal: Reducing estimation bias in regional NODDI metrics using tissue-weighted means.

C S Parker, T Veale, M Bocchetta, C F Slattery, I B Malone, D L Thomas, J M Schott, D M Cash, H Zhang, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gray Matter Microstructure Measured Using Diffusion Imaging as a Biomarker of Severity in Lewy Body Diseases.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Distinct Brain Drivers and Shared Cerebello-Cortical Input in ADCY5 and SGCE Hyperkinetic Movements.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multi-model Diffusion MRI Signatures in Atypical Parkinsonian Disorders.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

C S ParkerCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 90 High Holborn, Floor 1, London WC1V6LJ, United Kingdom. Electronic address: christopher.parker@ucl.ac.uk.
T VealeThe Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
M BocchettaThe Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
C F SlatteryThe Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
I B MaloneThe Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
D L ThomasThe Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom; Department of Brain Repair and Rehabilitation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom; Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
J M SchottThe Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
D M CashCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 90 High Holborn, Floor 1, London WC1V6LJ, United Kingdom; The Dementia Research Centre, Department of Neurodegenerative Disease, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, United Kingdom; UK Dementia Research Institute at UCL, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
H ZhangCentre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Computer Science, University College London, 90 High Holborn, Floor 1, London WC1V6LJ, United Kingdom.
Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative
University College London · GBUK Dementia Research Institute · GBNational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) estimates microstructural properties of brain tissue relating to the organisation and processing capacity of neurites, which are essential elements for neuronal communication. Descriptive statistics of NODDI tissue metrics are commonly analyzed in regions-of-interest (ROI) to identify brain-phenotype associations. Here, the conventional method to calculate the ROI mean weights all voxels equally. However, this produces biased estimates in the presence of CSF partial volume. This study introduces the tissue-weighted mean, which calculates the mean NODDI metric across the tissue within an ROI, utilising the tissue fraction estimate from NODDI to reduce estimation bias. We demonstrate the proposed mean in a study of white matter abnormalities in young onset Alzheimer's disease (YOAD). Results show the conventional mean induces significant bias that correlates with CSF partial volume, primarily affecting periventricular regions and more so in YOAD subjects than in healthy controls. Due to the differential extent of bias between healthy controls and YOAD subjects, the conventional mean under- or over-estimated the effect size for group differences in many ROIs. This demonstrates the importance of using the correct estimation procedure when inferring group differences in studies where the extent of CSF partial volume differs between groups. These findings are robust across different acquisition and processing conditions. Bias persists in ROIs at higher image resolution, as demonstrated using data obtained from the third phase of the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI); and when performing ROI analysis in template space. This suggests that conventional ROI means of NODDI metrics are biased estimates under most contemporary experimental conditions, the correction of which requires the proposed tissue-weighted mean. The tissue-weighted mean produces accurate estimates of ROI means and group differences when ROIs contain voxels with CSF partial volume. In addition to NODDI, the technique can be applied to other multi-compartment models that account for CSF partial volume, such as the free water elimination method. We expect the technique to help generate new insights into normal and abnormal variation in tissue microstructure of regions typically confounded by CSF partial volume, such as those in individuals with larger ventricles due to atrophy associated with neurodegenerative disease.

Indexed as

AdultAlzheimer DiseaseBiasDiffusion Tensor ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedModels, NeurologicalNeuritesPhenotypeWhite MatterArithmetic meanDiffusion MRIMicrostructure imagingRegion-of-interestTissue-weighted mean

Identifiers

PMID34852276
PMCPMC8752961
OpenAlexW3214870749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.