Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852168›Full record

ArticleRevista de saude publica2021

Running away from the jab: factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Brazil.

Marco Antonio Catussi Paschoalotto, Eduardo Polena Pacheco Araújo Costa, Sara Valente de Almeida, Joana Cima, Joana Gomes da Costa, João Vasco Santos, Pedro Pita Barros, Claudia Souza Passador, João Luiz Passador

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de saude publica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Intrastate inequality of COVID-19 vaccination coverage: spatial analysis and socioeconomic, Santa Catarina, 2021-2023.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marco Antonio Catussi PaschoalottoUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa. Nova School of Business and Economics. Carcavelos, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2276-8531
Eduardo Polena Pacheco Araújo CostaUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa. Nova School of Business and Economics. Carcavelos, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4347-6338
Sara Valente de AlmeidaUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa. Nova School of Business and Economics. Carcavelos, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9178-2105
Joana CimaUniversidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Políticas Económicas e Empresariais. Braga, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2780-7467
Joana Gomes da CostaUniversidade do Porto. Faculdade de Economia e Gestão. Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3233-1026
João Vasco SantosUniversidade do Porto. Faculdade de Medicina. MEDCIDS - Departamento Medicina da Comunidade, Informação e Decisão em Saúde. Porto, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4696-1002
Pedro Pita BarrosUniversidade NOVA de Lisboa. Nova School of Business and Economics. Carcavelos, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0881-4928
Claudia Souza PassadorUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9333-563X
João Luiz PassadorUniversidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Economia, Administração e Contabilidade de Ribeirão Preto. Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0460-8852

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate how sociodemographic conditions, political factors, organizational confidence, and non-pharmaceutical interventions compliance affect the COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Brazil.

methodsData collection took place between November 25th, 2020 and January 11th, 2021 using a nationwide online survey. Subsequently, the researches performed a descriptive analysis on the main variables and used logistic regression models to investigate the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy.

resultsLess concern over vaccine side effects could improve the willingness to be vaccinated (probability changed by 7.7 pp; p < 0.10). The current vaccine distrust espoused by the Brazilian president is associated with vaccine hesitancy, among his voter base. Lower performance perception ("Very Bad" with 10.7 pp; p < 0.01) or higher political opposition (left-oriented) regarding the current presidency is associated with the willingness to be vaccinated. Higher compliance with non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) is usually positively associated with the willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine (+1 score to NPI compliance index is associated with higher willingness to be vaccinated by 1.4 pp, p < 0.05).

conclusionWillingness to be vaccinated is strongly associated with political leaning, perceived federal government performance, vaccine side effects, and compliance with non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs).

Indexed as

COVID-19RunningBrazilCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID34852168
PMCPMC8639140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.