Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852014›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Genome-wide association analysis of chickpea germplasms differing for salinity tolerance based on DArTseq markers.

Shaimaa Mahmoud Ahmed, Alsamman Mahmoud Alsamman, Abdulqader Jighly, Mohamed Hassan Mubarak, Khaled Al-Shamaa, Tawffiq Istanbuli, Osama Ahmed Momtaz, Achraf El Allali, Aladdin Hamwieh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Chickpea (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shaimaa Mahmoud AhmedGene expression and regulation technology lab, Department of Plant Molecular Biology, Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Alsamman Mahmoud AlsammanMolecular Genetics and Genome Mapping, Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Giza, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7765-5035
Abdulqader JighlyAgriculture Victoria, AgriBio, Centre for AgriBiosciences, Bundoora, VIC, Australia.
Mohamed Hassan MubarakPlant Production Department, Faculty of Environmental Agricultural Sciences, El-Arish, North Sinai, Egypt.
Khaled Al-ShamaaGeoinformatics & Research Data Management, International Center for Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas, Giza, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-7668-3798
Tawffiq IstanbuliDepartment of Biodiversity and Crop Improvement, International Center for Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Osama Ahmed MomtazGene expression and regulation technology lab, Department of Plant Molecular Biology, Agricultural Genetic Engineering Research Institute, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.
Achraf El AllaliAfrican Genome Center, Mohammed VI Polytechnic University, Ben Guerir, Morocco.ORCID 0000-0002-4561-2161
Aladdin HamwiehDepartment of Biodiversity and Crop Improvement, International Center for Agriculture Research in the Dry Areas, Agricultural Research Centre, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soil salinity is significant abiotic stress that severely limits global crop production. Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important grain legume that plays a substantial role in nutritional food security, especially in the developing world. This study used a chickpea population collected from the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Area (ICARDA) genebank using the focused identification of germplasm strategy. The germplasm included 186 genotypes with broad Asian and African origins and genotyped with 1856 DArTseq markers. We conducted phenotyping for salinity in the field (Arish, Sinai, Egypt) and greenhouse hydroponic experiments at 100 mM NaCl concentration. Based on the performance in both hydroponic and field experiments, we identified seven genotypes from Azerbaijan and Pakistan (IGs: 70782, 70430, 70764, 117703, 6057, 8447, and 70249) as potential sources for high salinity tolerance. Multi-trait genome-wide association analysis (mtGWAS) detected one locus on chromosome Ca4 at 10618070 bp associated with salinity tolerance under hydroponic and field conditions. In addition, we located another locus specific to the hydroponic system on chromosome Ca2 at 30537619 bp. Gene annotation analysis revealed the location of rs5825813 within the Embryogenesis-associated protein (EMB8-like), while the location of rs5825939 is within the Ribosomal Protein Large P0 (RPLP0). Utilizing such markers in practical breeding programs can effectively improve the adaptability of current chickpea cultivars in saline soil. Moreover, researchers can use our markers to facilitate the incorporation of new genes into commercial cultivars.

Indexed as

AfricaAsian PeopleBiomarkersCicerGenome, PlantGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeHumansHydroponicsSalinitySalt ToleranceSequence Analysis, DNASodium ChlorideStress, PhysiologicalBiomarkersSodium Chloride

Identifiers

PMID34852014
PMCPMC8635330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.