Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852013›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Evaluating the association of self-reported psychological distress and self-rated health on survival times among women with breast cancer in the U.S.

Oluwaseun John Adeyemi, Tasha Leimomi Gill, Rajib Paul, Larissa Brunner Huber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The peak distress thermometer as a potent prognostic indicator for five-year survival in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. 'Patients are left not knowing': Trastuzumab (Herceptin) cardiac risk information and management in HER2-positive breast cancer-a qualitative study of patient experience.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Oluwaseun John AdeyemiDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7287-970X
Tasha Leimomi GillDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-5314
Rajib PaulDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Larissa Brunner HuberDepartment of Trauma and Orthopaedics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPsychological distress and self-rated health status may create additional complexities in patients already diagnosed with breast cancer. This study aims to assess the association of self-report-based assessment of psychological distress and self-rated health on survival times among women with breast cancer diagnoses.

methodsSeventeen-year data from the Integrated Public Use Microdata Series-National Health Interview Survey (IPUMS-NHIS) were pooled and analyzed. Women who were aged 30 to 64 years old, with breast cancer diagnosis were selected (n = 2,819). The outcome variable was time to death. The independent variables were self-reported assessment of psychological distress and self-rated health. Psychological distress was defined using the Kessler-6 scale while self-rated health was measured on a 3-point Likert scale: Poor, Fair, and Good-to-Excellent (referred to as good for brevity). We computed unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HR) using Cox-Proportional Hazard regression models with sociodemographic characteristics and measures of health care access used as potential confounders. Significance was set at alpha = 0.05.

resultsWomen with breast cancer assessed as having psychological distress had 46% (Adjusted HR: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.02-2.09) increased risks of mortality. Also, women who rated their health as poor or fair had a significantly elevated mortality risk (Poor Health: Adjusted HR: 3.05; 95% CI: 2.61-4.69; Fair Health: Adjusted HR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.43-2.35) as compared to women with good health status.

conclusionsSelf-reported psychological distress and fair and poor self-rated health are associated with reduced survival times among women with breast cancer diagnoses.

Indexed as

Psychological DistressAdultAge FactorsBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHealth StatusHumansMiddle AgedMortalityRace FactorsSelf-AssessmentSelf ReportStress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID34852013
PMCPMC8635381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.