Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34852012›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and child development at 36 months in the All Our Families prospective cohort study.

Natalie V Scime, Erin Hetherington, Lianne Tomfohr-Madsen, Alberto Nettel-Aguirre, Kathleen H Chaput, Suzanne C Tough

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association between maternal hypertension and infant neurodevelopment in extremely preterm infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natalie V ScimeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5811-7661
Erin HetheringtonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Lianne Tomfohr-MadsenDepartment of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Alberto Nettel-AguirreCentre for Health and Social Analytics, NIASRA, School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.
Kathleen H ChaputDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Suzanne C ToughDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (HDP) are associated with increased risk of offspring neurodevelopmental disorders, suggesting long-term adverse impacts on fetal brain development. However, the relationship between HDP and deficits in general child development is unclear. Our objective was to assess the association between HDP and motor and cognitive developmental delay in children at 36 months of age. We analyzed data from the All Our Families community-based cohort study (n = 1554). Diagnosis of HDP-gestational or chronic hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia-was measured through medical records. Child development was measured by maternal-report on five domains of the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ-3). Standardized cut-off scores were used to operationalize binary variables for any delay, motor delay, and cognitive delay. We calculated adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using logistic regression, sequentially controlling for potential confounders followed by factors suspected to lie on the causal pathway. Overall, 8.0% of women had HDP and hypertension-exposed children had higher prevalence of delay than unexposed children. Hypertension-exposed children had elevated risk for developmental delay, but CIs crossed the null. The aRRs quantifying the fully adjusted effect of HDP on child development were 1.19 (95% CI 0.92, 1.53) for any delay, 1.18 (95% CI 0.86, 1.61) for motor delay, and 1.24 (95% CI 0.83, 1.85) for cognitive delay. We did not find a statistically significant association between HDP and developmental delay. Confidence intervals suggest that children exposed to HDP in utero have either similar or slightly elevated risk of any, motor, and cognitive delay at 36 months after controlling for maternal and obstetric characteristics. The observed direction of association aligns with evidence of biological mechanisms whereby hypertensive pathology can disrupt fetal neurodevelopment; however, more evidence is needed. Findings may have implications for early developmental monitoring and intervention following prenatal hypertension exposure.

Indexed as

Age FactorsChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEclampsiaFemaleHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedInfantInfant, NewbornNeurodevelopmental DisordersPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPrevalenceProspective StudiesRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID34852012
PMCPMC8635344
OpenAlexW3216292275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.