Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34851999›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Development of prediction models of spontaneous ureteral stone passage through machine learning: Comparison with conventional statistical analysis.

Jee Soo Park, Dong Wook Kim, Dongu Lee, Taeju Lee, Kyo Chul Koo, Woong Kyu Han, Byung Ha Chung, Kwang Suk Lee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jee Soo ParkDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Dong Wook KimDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Yonsei University College of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-6167-6475
Dongu LeeDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Taeju LeeDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kyo Chul KooDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Woong Kyu HanDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Byung Ha ChungDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kwang Suk LeeDepartment of Urology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7961-8393
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo develop a prediction model of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) using machine learning and logistic regression and compare the performance of the two models. Indications for management of ureteral stones are unclear, and the clinician determines whether to wait for SSP or perform active treatment, especially in well-controlled patients, to avoid unwanted complications. Therefore, suggesting the possibility of SSP would help make a clinical decision regarding ureteral stones.

methodsPatients diagnosed with unilateral ureteral stones at our emergency department between August 2014 and September 2018 were included and underwent non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography 4 weeks from the first stone episode. Predictors of SSP were applied to build and validate the prediction model using multilayer perceptron (MLP) with the Keras framework.

resultsOf 833 patients, SSP was observed in 606 (72.7%). SSP rates were 68.2% and 75.6% for stone sizes 5-10 mm and <5 mm, respectively. Stone opacity, location, and whether it was the first ureteral stone episode were significant predictors of SSP. Areas under the curve (AUCs) for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for MLP, and logistic regression were 0.859 and 0.847, respectively, for stones <5 mm, and 0.881 and 0.817, respectively, for 5-10 mm stones.

conclusionSSP prediction models were developed in patients with well-controlled unilateral ureteral stones; the performance of the models was good, especially in identifying SSP for 5-10-mm ureteral stones without definite treatment guidelines. To further improve the performance of these models, future studies should focus on using machine learning techniques in image analysis.

Indexed as

AdultAge FactorsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSex FactorsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUreteral Calculi

Identifiers

PMID34851999
PMCPMC8635399
OpenAlexW3214850691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.