Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34851984›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2021

Short- and long-term effects of a cardiac rehabilitation program in patients implanted with a left ventricular assist device.

Anna Scaglione, Claudia Panzarino, Maddalena Modica, Monica Tavanelli, Antonio Pezzano, Paola Grati, Vittorio Racca, Anastasia Toccafondi, Bruno Bordoni, Alessandro Verde and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of Incremental Shuttle Walking Test, 6-Minute Walking Test, and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Stress Test in Patients with Myocardial Infarction.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna ScaglioneCardiology Rehabilitation Center, Santa Maria Nascente Institute, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Claudia PanzarinoCardiology Rehabilitation Center, Santa Maria Nascente Institute, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Maddalena ModicaCardiology Rehabilitation Center, Santa Maria Nascente Institute, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Monica TavanelliCardiology Rehabilitation Center, Santa Maria Nascente Institute, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Antonio PezzanoCardiology Rehabilitation Center, Santa Maria Nascente Institute, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Paola GratiCardiology Rehabilitation Center, Santa Maria Nascente Institute, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Vittorio RaccaCardiology Rehabilitation Center, Santa Maria Nascente Institute, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4465-3789
Anastasia ToccafondiCardiology Rehabilitation Center, Santa Maria Nascente Institute, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Bruno BordoniCardiology Rehabilitation Center, Santa Maria Nascente Institute, IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro VerdeHeart Failure and Heart Transplant Program, CardioThoracic and Vascular Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Iside CartellaHeart Failure and Heart Transplant Program, CardioThoracic and Vascular Department, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy.
Paolo CastiglioniIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8775-2605
Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The efficacy of cardiac rehabilitation in heart-failure patients who received a left-ventricular assist device (LVAD) instead of heart transplantation (HTx) is still unclear. This study aims to evaluate whether cardiac rehabilitation is beneficial in LVAD as HTx patients in the short term and whether its effects in LVAD patients persist over time. Twenty-five LVAD patients were evaluated by functional and psychological tests at admission (T0) and discharge (T1) of a 4-week inpatient structured rehabilitation program, and follow-ups 3 (T2), 6 (T3), and 12 months (T4) after discharge. Twenty-five matched HTx patients were also studied from T0 to T1 to compare the improvements in the six-minute walk test (6MWT). The quality-of-life scores substantially improved in LVAD patients and the 6MWT showed the same functional recovery as in HTx patients from T0 to T1. After T1, numerous LVAD patients withdrew from the study. However, the 6MWT outcome increased further from T1 to T3, with a positive trend during the follow-ups. Hemoglobin and the ventilatory performance increased, and the psychological perception of heart-failure symptoms and pain further improved at T2. In conclusion, exercise-based rehabilitation programs provide similar beneficial effects in LVAD and HTx patients, without deterioration in LVAD patients up to 12 months after discharge.

Indexed as

Heart-Assist DevicesAgedCardiac Surgical ProceduresExercise TherapyFemaleHeart FailureHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID34851984
PMCPMC8635401
OpenAlexW3216811021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.