Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34851948›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2021

Dynamic maximum entropy provides accurate approximation of structured population dynamics.

Katarína Bod'ová, Enikő Szép, Nicholas H Barton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dynamical theory of complex systems with two-way micro-macro causation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  3. Exponential Families with External Parameters.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Katarína Bod'ováFaculty of Mathematics, Physics and Informatics, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia.ORCID 0000-0002-7214-0171
Enikő SzépInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria), Klosterneuburg, Austria.
Nicholas H BartonInstitute of Science and Technology Austria (IST Austria), Klosterneuburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-8548-5240

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Realistic models of biological processes typically involve interacting components on multiple scales, driven by changing environment and inherent stochasticity. Such models are often analytically and numerically intractable. We revisit a dynamic maximum entropy method that combines a static maximum entropy with a quasi-stationary approximation. This allows us to reduce stochastic non-equilibrium dynamics expressed by the Fokker-Planck equation to a simpler low-dimensional deterministic dynamics, without the need to track microscopic details. Although the method has been previously applied to a few (rather complicated) applications in population genetics, our main goal here is to explain and to better understand how the method works. We demonstrate the usefulness of the method for two widely studied stochastic problems, highlighting its accuracy in capturing important macroscopic quantities even in rapidly changing non-stationary conditions. For the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process, the method recovers the exact dynamics whilst for a stochastic island model with migration from other habitats, the approximation retains high macroscopic accuracy under a wide range of scenarios in a dynamic environment.

Indexed as

EntropyPopulation DynamicsStochastic ProcessesAnimalsBiologyComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEcosystemHumansModels, BiologicalNormal DistributionProbabilityReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID34851948
PMCPMC8668141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.