Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34851154›Full record

ArticleActa radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987)2023

Inter- and intra-observer agreement on evaluating the presence of residual glandular tissue with magnetic resonance tomography following prophylactic mastectomy.

Märta A Skoglund, Magnus N Andersson, Annika Björkgren, Ernst Tolocka, Malin Sund, Rebecca Wiberg

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta radiologica (Stockholm, Sweden : 1987), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05162677 (Prophylactic Mastectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05162677 recruitingnot on this map

Prophylactic Mastectomy: Prospective Evaluation of the Correlation Between Skin Flap Thickness, Residual Glandular Tissue and Skin Necrosis by Imaging and Clinical Examination

TypeobservationalSponsorUmeå UniversityRan2022 to 2027Enrolled45ConditionsProphylactic Mastectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Märta A Skoglund206100Department of Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Plastic surgery and Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Magnus N Andersson206100Department of Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Plastic surgery and Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9280-8888
Annika Björkgren211743Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology and Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Ernst Tolocka211743Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology and Radiology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Malin Sund206100Department of Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Plastic surgery and Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Rebecca Wiberg206100Department of Surgical & Perioperative Sciences, Plastic surgery and Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2777-8184
Umeå University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are no published international consensus or guideline documents regarding appropriate medical follow-up for women with hereditary increased risk of breast cancer who opt for prophylactic mastectomy. Moreover, it is not known whether breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed after a prophylactic mastectomy is a reproducible method for evaluating whether clinically relevant amounts of residual glandular tissue remains. PURPOSE: To evaluate the inter- and intra-observer agreement on detecting residual glandular tissue with MRI. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn total, 40 women previously operated with prophylactic mastectomy underwent MRI and two breast radiologists (R1 and R2) independently assessed the presence of residual glandular tissue. Inter- and intra-rater agreements were assessed using Cohen's kappa (k).

resultsResidual glandular tissue was found in 69 of 248 quadrants (27.8%) and 32 of 62 breasts (51.6%) by R1 and 77 of 248 quadrants (31.1%) and 35 of 62 breasts (56.5%) by R2. The interrater agreement was observed to be moderate (k = 0.554) and the intra-rater agreement was observed to be substantial (k = 0.623).

conclusionIn conclusion, the inter-and intra-rater observer agreement in regard to detection of residual glandular tissue was not excellent, which would be desirable for a method considered reproducible enough to be used as a surveillance tool after the surgical procedure in order to ensure that there is no relevant residual glandular tissue remaining warranting further follow-up. More research is needed, as well as establishment of precise protocols, before using the method in risk assessment of remaining glandular tissue and breast cancer risk.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsProphylactic MastectomyFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMastectomyObserver VariationReproducibility of Resultsmagnetic resonance tomographyProphylactic mastectomyresidual glandular tissue

Identifiers

PMID34851154
PMCPMC9780752
OpenAlexW3215794559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.