ArticleNursing open2022
Development and evaluation of virtual reality simulation education based on coronavirus disease 2019 scenario for nursing students: A pilot study.
Article in Nursing open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital Strategies Utilised to Encourage Undergraduate Nursing Students' Engagement in Online Units of Study Throughout the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review.Nursing open · 2026Pooled it
- Simulation-based infection prevention and control training for medical and healthcare students: a systematic review.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Enhancing medical education with chatbots: a randomized controlled trial on standardized patients for colorectal cancer.BMC medical education · 2024Trial
- Virtual Reality Simulation in Disaster Nursing Education and Training: A Scoping Review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2026Article
- Development of an Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Nursing Program Involving Patients with Respiratory Infections.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Applications and Challenges of Virtual Reality in Medical Sciences Education: A Systematic Review.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2026Review
- Evaluating an Education Program That Incorporated Virtual Reality for Teaching Aggression Management: A Pre-Post Pilot Study With Nursing Students.Nursing open · 2026Article
- Simulation-Based Learning Supported by Technology to Enhance Critical Thinking in Nursing Students: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Designing and implementing a training program on surgical hand scrubbing, wearing surgical cap and surgical mask, gowning, and gloving using HMD-based virtual reality technologies for nursing students: an exploration of student perceptions.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- The effect of scenario-based training on the Core competencies of nursing students: a semi-experimental study.BMC nursing · 2023Article
- Virtual Reality Applications in Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review.JMIR serious games · 2022Review
- Development and evaluation of virtual reality simulation education based on coronavirus disease 2019 scenario for nursing students: A pilot study.Nursing open · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimThis research is designed to establish and evaluate the effectiveness of a virtual reality simulation program using COVID-19 scenario for nursing students.
designThis is a quasi-experimental study using a non-equivalent control group pre-test-posttest design.
methodsThe participants were 65 students in their fourth year in nursing college. The knowledge about communicable infectious diseases in the respiratory system, self-efficacy, clinical reasoning capacity and learning satisfaction was evaluated.
resultsThe experimental group showed a significantly higher learning satisfaction (t = 3.01, p = .004). Both groups presented statistically significant differences in knowledge on infectious respiratory diseases, self-efficacy and clinical reasoning between pre-test and posttest. However, knowledge (t = 0.47, p = .643), self-efficacy (t = 0.70, p = .944) and clinical reasoning were not different between the groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.