Trial reportRheumatology (Oxford, England)2022
Undifferentiated arthritis: a changing population who did not benefit from enhanced disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug strategies-results from a 25 year longitudinal inception cohort.
Trial report in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Observational
- Undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis in a tuberculosis-positive patient: a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge - a case report.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Predicting rheumatoid arthritis progression from seronegative undifferentiated arthritis using machine learning: a deep learning model trained on the KURAMA cohort and externally validated with the ANSWER cohort.Arthritis research & therapy · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Synovial tissue features associated with poor prognosis in inflammatory arthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2024Article
- Disentangling heterogeneity in contemporary undifferentiated arthritis - A large cohort study using latent class analysis.Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism · 2023Article
- Outcomes of undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis in real-world practice. A longitudinal cohort study.Clinical rheumatology · 2023Article
- Stratified distribution of Th17 and Treg cells in patients with multi-stage rheumatoid arthritis.Arthritis research & therapy · 2023Article
- No excess mortality in contemporary undifferentiated arthritis, in contrast to rheumatoid arthritis: a study with a follow-up of at least 10 years.Annals of the rheumatic diseases · 2022Article
- The undifferentiated arthritis dilemma: the story continues.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2022Article
- Editorial: Risk factors for Rheumatoid Arthritis and pre-Rheumatoid Arthritis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesInternational guidelines stress timely DMARD initiation in early arthritis as well as when classification criteria are not yet fulfilled. Consequently, undifferentiated arthritis (UA) patients may be increasingly treated with DMARDs. Since UA is a diagnosis of exclusion, the introduction of the 2010 classification criteria presumably decreased the UA population, as former UA patients became regarded as RA. Consequently, the contemporary definition of UA has changed into: no clinical diagnosis and not fulfilling the 1987 nor 2010 RA-criteria. Importantly, placebo-controlled trials on DMARD efficacy in contemporary UA are absent. We aimed to study whether enhanced treatment strategies across the last 25 years improved outcomes in contemporary UA, whereby inclusion period was used as instrumental variable for DMARD treatment.
methodsUA was defined, retrospectively, as clinical arthritis (joint swelling at physical examination) neither fulfilling the 1987 nor 2010 RA-criteria or any other clinical diagnosis. In total, 1132 UA patients consecutively included in the Leiden Early Arthritis Clinic between 1993 and 2019 were divided into five inclusion periods: 1993-1997, 1998-2005, 2006-2010, 2011-2014 and 2015-2019. The frequency of DMARD initiation was compared across the inclusion periods, as were the following outcomes: 28-joint DAS with CRP (DAS28-CRP) and the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI) during follow-up, prevalence of DMARD-free-status within 10 years (DFS; spontaneous remission or sustained remission after DMARD stop) and progression to RA (according 1987/2010 criteria).
resultsThe contemporary UA population is mainly autoantibody negative, with a median swollen joint count of 2, tender joint count of 3 and HAQ score of 0.6. These characteristics were similar across the inclusion periods. DMARD treatment increased from 17% (1993-1997) to 52% (2015-2019) and methotrexate became more common. The DAS28-CRP during follow-up improved from 2011 onwards (-0.18 to -0.25 DAS units; P < 0.05). Disability scores during follow-up did not significantly improve. DFS prevalence also remained similar: 58%, 57% and 61% for 1993-1997, 1998-2005 and 2006-2010, respectively (P = 0.77). Likewise, the percentages of RA development did not decrease (14%, 21%, 26%, 18% and 27%, respectively).
conclusionAlthough intensified DMARD treatment slightly improved disease activity scores, physical functioning and long-term outcomes did not improve. This suggests overtreatment in the contemporary UA population and underlines the importance of developing stratification methods suitable for this patient-population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.