Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34850849›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2022

Predictors of interest in predictive testing for rheumatoid arthritis among first degree relatives of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

Imogen Wells, Dawit T Zemedikun, Gwenda Simons, Rebecca J Stack, Christian D Mallen, Karim Raza, Marie Falahee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Can the General Public Be a Proxy for an "At-Risk" Group in a Patient Preference Study? A Disease Prevention Example in Rheumatoid Arthritis.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Imogen WellsInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences.ORCID 0000-0002-9975-5029
Dawit T ZemedikunInstitute of Applied Health Research.ORCID 0000-0003-3642-0456
Gwenda SimonsInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences.ORCID 0000-0003-2596-9101
Rebecca J StackInstitute of Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.ORCID 0000-0002-0516-0228
Christian D MallenPrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele.ORCID 0000-0002-2677-1028
Karim RazaInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences.ORCID 0000-0003-1570-1232
Marie FalaheeInstitute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences.ORCID 0000-0001-5928-486X
Arthritis UK · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MR/P021220/1National Institute for Health Research NIHR-RP-2014-04-026NIHRVersus Arthritis 21560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is increasing interest in prediction and prevention of RA. It is important to understand the views of those at risk to inform the development of effective approaches. First-degree relatives (FDRs) of RA patients are at increased risk of RA. This study assessed predictors of their interest in predictive testing for RA.

methodsQuestionnaires were completed by RA patients (provided with their questionnaire by a healthcare professional) and their FDRs (provided with their questionnaire by their RA proband). FDR surveys assessed interest in taking a predictive test, demographic variables, perceived RA risk, attitudes about predictive testing, autonomy preferences, illness perceptions, avoidance coping and health anxiety. Patient surveys included demographic variables, disease impact, RA duration and treatment. Ordinal logistic regression examined the association between FDRs' characteristics and their interest in predictive testing. Generalized estimating equations assessed associations between patient characteristics and FDRs' interest in predictive testing.

resultsThree hundred and ninety-six FDRs responded. Paired data from the RA proband were available for 292. The proportion of FDRs interested in predictive testing was 91.3%. Information-seeking preferences, beliefs that predictive testing can increase empowerment over health and positive attitudes about risk knowledge were associated with increased interest. Beliefs that predictive testing could cause psychological harm predicted lower interest. Patient characteristics of the proband were not associated with FDRs' interest.

conclusionsFDRs' interest in predictive testing for RA was high, and factors associated with interest were identified. These findings will inform the development of predictive strategies and informational resources for those at risk.

Indexed as

Arthritis, RheumatoidFamilyHumansLogistic ModelsRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnairesfirst degree relativespredictive testingRArisk perceptionsurvey

Identifiers

PMID34850849
PMCPMC9348622
OpenAlexW3215035740

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.