ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2022
Addressing noise in co-expression network construction.
Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genome-Wide Characterization of the WOX Gene Family inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Computational strategies for cross-species knowledge transfer.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Uncovering coordinated pathway interactions through gene co-differential expression in yeast.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- circGPAcorr: an integrative tool for functional annotation of circular RNAs using expression data.BioData mining · 2025Article
- An efficient, not-only-linear correlation coefficient based on clustering.Cell systems · 2024Article
- Computational strategies for cross-species knowledge transfer and translational biomedicine.ArXiv · 2024Article
- HyperTMO: a trusted multi-omics integration framework based on hypergraph convolutional network for patient classification.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Integrating genetics and transcriptomics to study major depressive disorder: a conceptual framework, bioinformatic approaches, and recent findings.Translational psychiatry · 2023Review
- From Classical to Modern Computational Approaches to Identify Key Genetic Regulatory Components in Plant Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- A phenotype driven integrative framework uncovers molecular mechanisms of a rare hereditary thrombophilia.PloS one · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene co-expression networks (GCNs) provide multiple benefits to molecular research including hypothesis generation and biomarker discovery. Transcriptome profiles serve as input for GCN construction and are derived from increasingly larger studies with samples across multiple experimental conditions, treatments, time points, genotypes, etc. Such experiments with larger numbers of variables confound discovery of true network edges, exclude edges and inhibit discovery of context (or condition) specific network edges. To demonstrate this problem, a 475-sample dataset is used to show that up to 97% of GCN edges can be misleading because correlations are false or incorrect. False and incorrect correlations can occur when tests are applied without ensuring assumptions are met, and pairwise gene expression may not meet test assumptions if the expression of at least one gene in the pairwise comparison is a function of multiple confounding variables. The 'one-size-fits-all' approach to GCN construction is therefore problematic for large, multivariable datasets. Recently, the Knowledge Independent Network Construction toolkit has been used in multiple studies to provide a dynamic approach to GCN construction that ensures statistical tests meet assumptions and confounding variables are addressed. Additionally, it can associate experimental context for each edge of the network resulting in context-specific GCNs (csGCNs). To help researchers recognize such challenges in GCN construction, and the creation of csGCNs, we provide a review of the workflow.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.