Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34850822›Full record

ReviewBriefings in bioinformatics2022

Addressing noise in co-expression network construction.

Joshua J R Burns, Benjamin T Shealy, Mitchell S Greer, John A Hadish, Matthew T McGowan, Tyler Biggs, Melissa C Smith, F Alex Feltus, Stephen P Ficklin

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joshua J R BurnsDepartment of Horticulture, 149 Johnson Hall. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA.
Benjamin T ShealyDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 105 Riggs Hall. Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631. USA.
Mitchell S GreerSchool of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, EME 102. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA.
John A HadishMolecular Plant Sciences Program, French Ad 324g. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA.
Matthew T McGowanMolecular Plant Sciences Program, French Ad 324g. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA.
Tyler BiggsDepartment of Horticulture, 149 Johnson Hall. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA.
Melissa C SmithDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, 105 Riggs Hall. Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29631. USA.
F Alex FeltusDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, 130 McGinty Court. Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634. USA.
Stephen P FicklinDepartment of Horticulture, 149 Johnson Hall. Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164. USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9138-6292

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene co-expression networks (GCNs) provide multiple benefits to molecular research including hypothesis generation and biomarker discovery. Transcriptome profiles serve as input for GCN construction and are derived from increasingly larger studies with samples across multiple experimental conditions, treatments, time points, genotypes, etc. Such experiments with larger numbers of variables confound discovery of true network edges, exclude edges and inhibit discovery of context (or condition) specific network edges. To demonstrate this problem, a 475-sample dataset is used to show that up to 97% of GCN edges can be misleading because correlations are false or incorrect. False and incorrect correlations can occur when tests are applied without ensuring assumptions are met, and pairwise gene expression may not meet test assumptions if the expression of at least one gene in the pairwise comparison is a function of multiple confounding variables. The 'one-size-fits-all' approach to GCN construction is therefore problematic for large, multivariable datasets. Recently, the Knowledge Independent Network Construction toolkit has been used in multiple studies to provide a dynamic approach to GCN construction that ensures statistical tests meet assumptions and confounding variables are addressed. Additionally, it can associate experimental context for each edge of the network resulting in context-specific GCNs (csGCNs). To help researchers recognize such challenges in GCN construction, and the creation of csGCNs, we provide a review of the workflow.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksTranscriptomeco-expressiongene expressionmultidimensionalnetworksnoise

Identifiers

PMID34850822
PMCPMC8769892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.