Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34850279›Full record

ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

Biotechnology of camptothecin production in Nothapodytes nimmoniana, Ophiorrhiza sp. and Camptotheca acuminata.

Mallappa Kumara Swamy, Shreya Nath, Subhabrata Paul, Niraj Kumar Jha, Boregowda Purushotham, Komdur Channabasavaraju Rohit, Abhijit Dey

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Natural Products from Herbal Medicine Self-Assemble into Advanced Bioactive Materials.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mallappa Kumara SwamyDepartment of Biotechnology, East West First Grade College, Bengaluru, India. swamy.bio@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7834-7480
Shreya NathSchool of Biotechnology, Presidency University (2nd Campus), Action Area-ID, New Town, Kolkata, 700156, India.
Subhabrata PaulSchool of Biotechnology, Presidency University (2nd Campus), Action Area-ID, New Town, Kolkata, 700156, India.
Niraj Kumar JhaDepartment of Biotechnology, School of Engineering & Technology (SET), Sharda University, Greater Noida, 201310, India.
Boregowda PurushothamDepartment of Biotechnology, East West First Grade College, Bengaluru, India.
Komdur Channabasavaraju RohitDepartment of Biotechnology, East West First Grade College, Bengaluru, India.
Abhijit DeyDepartment of Life Sciences, Presidency University, 86/1 College Street, Kolkata, 700073, West Bengal, India. abhijit.dbs@presiuniv.ac.in.
Presidency University · INDepartment of Biotechnology · INSharda University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is probably the deadliest human disease in recent years. In the past few years, rapid clinical progress has been made in the field of anticancer drug development. Plant secondary metabolites have been noted as extremely efficacious as promising natural source for anticancer therapy for many years. Camptothecin (CPT) is one of the popularly used anti-tumor drugs possessing clinically proven properties against a plethora of human malignancies that include ovarian and colorectal cancers. For the first time, CPT was obtained from the extracts of a Chinese medicinal tree, Camptotheca acuminata Decne. from the family Cornaceae. Subsequently, CPT was also isolated from the bark of Nothapodytes foetida (Wight) Sleumer (Icacinaceae). However, the availability of enough natural sources for obtaining CPT is a major constraint. Due to overexploitation and harvesting, loss of habitat, excessive trading, and unfavorable environmental factors, the natural source of CPT has become extinct or extremely limited and hence they are red listed under endangered species. Conventional propagation has also failed to meet the ever-expanding demand for CPT production. With this, biotechnological toolkits have constantly been used as a boon to produce sustainable source, utilization, and ex situ conservation of medicinal plants. The approaches serve as a supplement to traditional agriculture in the mass production of plant metabolites with potent bioactivities. Non-availability of enough anticancer medicine and the requirement to satisfy current demands need a sustainable source of CPT. With this background, we present a comprehensive review on CPT discovery, its occurrence in the plant kingdom, biosynthesis, phytochemistry, pharmacological properties, clinical studies, patterns of CPT accumulation, and biotechnological aspects of CPT production in three plants, viz., N. nimmoniana, Ophiorrhiza species, and C. acuminata.Key points• Biotechnological approaches on production of camptothecin from Nothapodytes nimmoniana, Ophiorrhiza species, and Camptotheca acuminata• In vitro propagation of camptothecin-producing plants• Genetic diversity and transgenic research on camptothecin-producing plants.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecaMagnoliopsidaRubiaceaeBiotechnologyCamptothecinHumansAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicCamptothecinBiosynthesisBiotechnologyCancerCell cultureMedicinal plantMicropropagation

Identifiers

PMID34850279
OpenAlexW3215656065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.