Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34850260›Full record

ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2021

[Imaging of oligometastatic disease in selected urologic cancers].

S A Koerber, C A Fink, K Dendl, D Schmitt, G Niegisch, E Mamlins, F L Giesel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

S A KoerberKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
C A FinkKlinik für Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
K DendlKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
D SchmittKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
G NiegischKlinik für Urologie, Medizinische Fakultät, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
E MamlinsKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
F L GieselKlinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Medizinische Fakultät, Heinrich-Heine-Universität, Moorenstraße 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Deutschland. frederik.giesel@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
Düsseldorf University Hospital · DEHeidelberg University · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLocal treatment of the primary or metastatic sites in urologic malignancies is promising when compared to systemic therapy alone, leading to the definition of a potentially curative oligometastatic state.

objectivesComparison of imaging modalities regarding local and metastatic tumor sites in urologic cancers.

methodsReview of comparative trials addressing quality criteria of imaging modalities.

resultsDepending on primary tumor and metastatic site, conventional imaging modalities such as computer tomography (CT) and bone scintigraphy still represent the standard of care in Germany. Due to superior quality criteria, hybrid-imaging techniques were widely adopted for oncological staging and particular due to the new PSMA-ligand (PSMA-PET/CT) in prostate cancer imaging. The development of new radioisotopes as well as their clinical application remains a focus of current research.

conclusionsHigh-quality diagnostic imaging modalities lay the groundwork for a precise definition of an oligometastatic state. By enabling treatment of the entire tumor burden, a delay of systemic therapy, longer progression-free survival, or even curative treatment may become achievable.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsUrologic NeoplasmsHumansMaleMultimodal ImagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyTumor BurdenOligometastasisPositron emission tomographyProstate cancerRenal cell cancerUrothelial cancer

Identifiers

PMID34850260
OpenAlexW3214910808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.