Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34850165›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2021

Single-molecule mitochondrial DNA sequencing shows no evidence of CpG methylation in human cells and tissues.

Iacopo Bicci, Claudia Calabrese, Zoe J Golder, Aurora Gomez-Duran, Patrick F Chinnery

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Exercise intensity and training alter the innate immune cell type and chromosomal origins of circulating cell-free DNA in humans.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Population-scale detection of methylation outliers from long-read genome sequencing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Mitochondrial epigenetic mechanisms in cancer: an updated overview.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Iacopo BicciMRC-Mitochondrial Biology Unit, The Keith Peters Building, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.
Claudia CalabreseMRC-Mitochondrial Biology Unit, The Keith Peters Building, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.
Zoe J GolderMRC-Mitochondrial Biology Unit, The Keith Peters Building, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.
Aurora Gomez-DuranMRC-Mitochondrial Biology Unit, The Keith Peters Building, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.
Patrick F ChinneryMRC-Mitochondrial Biology Unit, The Keith Peters Building, Cambridge CB2 0XY, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7065-6617
University of Cambridge · GBConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00015/7Medical Research Council MC_UU_00015/9Medical Research Council MR/S005021/1Medical Research Council MR/S035699/1MRC MR/S035699/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212219/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methylation on CpG residues is one of the most important epigenetic modifications of nuclear DNA, regulating gene expression. Methylation of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has been studied using whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS), but recent evidence has uncovered technical issues which introduce a potential bias during methylation quantification. Here, we validate the technical concerns of WGBS, and develop and assess the accuracy of a new protocol for mtDNA nucleotide variant-specific methylation using single-molecule Oxford Nanopore Sequencing (ONS). Our approach circumvents confounders by enriching for full-length molecules over nuclear DNA. Variant calling analysis against showed that 99.5% of homoplasmic mtDNA variants can be reliably identified providing there is adequate sequencing depth. We show that some of the mtDNA methylation signal detected by ONS is due to sequence-specific false positives introduced by the technique. The residual signal was observed across several human primary and cancer cell lines and multiple human tissues, but was always below the error threshold modelled using negative controls. We conclude that there is no evidence for CpG methylation in human mtDNA, thus resolving previous controversies. Additionally, we developed a reliable protocol to study epigenetic modifications of mtDNA at single-molecule and single-base resolution, with potential applications beyond CpG methylation.

Indexed as

CpG IslandsDNA MethylationCell LineCell Line, TumorDNA, MitochondrialGenetic VariationHumansNanopore SequencingWhole Genome SequencingDNA, Mitochondrial

Identifiers

PMID34850165
PMCPMC8682748
OpenAlexW3211601558

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.