Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849995›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2021

Effects of feeding lubabegron on gas emissions, growth performance, and carcass characteristics of beef cattle housed in small-pen environmentally monitored enclosures during the last 3 mo of the finishing period.

J Scott Teeter, Samantha J Werth, Sandra L Gruber, John C Kube, Jacob A Hagenmaier, Janet B Allen, Cory T Herr, Michael S Brown, Dustin Boler, Anna C Dilger and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J Scott TeeterElanco, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
Samantha J WerthDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9129-6665
Sandra L GruberElanco, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
John C KubeElanco, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
Jacob A HagenmaierElanco, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
Janet B AllenElanco, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
Cory T HerrElanco, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
Michael S BrownElanco, Greenfield, IN 46140, USA.
Dustin BolerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Anna C DilgerDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Yongjing ZhaoDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Yuee PanDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Frank M MitloehnerDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Elanco (United States) · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of technologies that promote environmental stewardship while maintaining or improving the efficiency of food animal production is essential to the sustainability of producing a food supply to meet the demands of a growing population. As such, Elanco (Greenfield, IN) pursued an environmental indication for a selective β-modulator (lubabegron; LUB). LUB was recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be fed to feedlot cattle during the last 14 to 91 d of the feeding period for reductions in gas emissions/kg of unshrunk final BW and HCW. A 4 × 2 factorial arrangement of treatments was used with the factors of dose (0.0, 1.38, 5.5, or 22.0 mg·kg-1 DM basis) and sex (steers or heifers). Three 91-d cycles were conducted (112 cattle/cycle) with each dose × sex combination being represented by a single cattle pen enclosure (CPE; 14 cattle/CPE) resulting in a total of 168 steers and 168 heifers (n = 6 replicates/dose). There were no interactions observed between dose and sex for any variable measured in the study (P ≥ 0.063). Five gases were evaluated for all pens based on CPE concentrations relative to ambient air: NH3, CH4, N2O, H2S, and CO2. Cumulative NH3 gas emissions were reduced by feeding cattle 5.5 and 22.0 mg·kg-1 LUB (P ≤ 0.023) and tended (P = 0.076) to be lower for the cattle fed 1.38 mg·kg-1 LUB compared with the negative controls (CON). The cumulative NH3 gas emission reductions of 960 to 1032 g, coupled with HCW increases (P ≤ 0.019) of 15 to 16 kg for all LUB doses vs. CON, led to reductions in NH3 gas emissions/kg HCW for all three LUB treatments (P ≤ 0.004). Similar to HCW, reductions in NH3 gas emissions/kg of unshrunk final BW were observed for all LUB doses (P ≤ 0.009) and were attributable to both decreases in NH3 gas emissions and numerical increases in BW. Dose had no effect on cumulative emissions or emissions standardized by BW or HCW for the other four gases (P ≥ 0.268). LUB is a novel tool to reduce emissions of NH3 gas per kilogram of unshrunk live BW and hot carcass weight.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietAdrenergic AgentsAnimalsBody CompositionCattleFemaleGasesAdrenergic AgentsGasesammonia gas emissionscarcass characteristicsenvironmentfeedlot cattlelubabegrontenderness

Identifiers

PMID34849995
PMCPMC8668178
OpenAlexW3215793382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.