Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849977›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2022

In vitro activity of the orally bioavailable ceftibuten/VNRX-7145 (VNRX-5236 etzadroxil) combination against a challenge set of Enterobacterales pathogens carrying molecularly characterized β-lactamase genes.

Rodrigo E Mendes, Paul R Rhomberg, Amy A Watters, Mariana Castanheira

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. ARGONAUT-IV: susceptibility of carbapenemase-producingAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rodrigo E MendesJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA.
Paul R RhombergJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA.
Amy A WattersJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA.
Mariana CastanheiraJMI Laboratories, North Liberty, IA, USA.
JMI Laboratories · US

Funding

Broad-spectrum, Orally Bioavailable Beta-lactamase Inhibitors for BiodefenseR01AI111539 · NIAID · VENATORX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. · PI BURNS, CHRISTOPHER JOHN, XERRI, LUIGI · 2014 to 2017
$6.1M
NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201600029CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI111539NIH HHS 1R01AI111539NIH HHS HHSN272201600029C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study assessed the activity of ceftibuten, ceftibuten combined with the active form (VNRX-5236) of the β-lactamase inhibitor VNRX-7145 and comparators against a challenge set of Gram-negative pathogens.

methodsTwo hundred and five Enterobacterales carrying plasmid AmpC (53 isolates), ESBL (50), KPC (50), OXA-48-like (49) or OXA-48-like with KPC (3) encoding genes were selected. Susceptibility was determined by broth microdilution. VNRX-5236 and avibactam were tested at a fixed concentration of 4 mg/L.

resultsCeftibuten/VNRX-5236 (MIC50/90 0.12/1 mg/L) MIC values were 256-fold lower than those of ceftibuten (MIC50/90 32/256 mg/L) for all Enterobacterales and 2- to 4-fold lower than those of ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC50/90 0.5/2 mg/L). For isolates producing a plasmid-encoded AmpC, VNRX-5236 decreased ceftibuten MIC (MIC50/90 0.12/1 mg/L) by at least 512-fold compared with ceftibuten (MIC50/90 128/>256 mg/L). Ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 (MIC50/90 0.06/0.12 mg/L) and meropenem (MIC50/90 ≤0.03/0.06 mg/L; 100% susceptible) showed comparable activities against ESBL isolates and these agents had MIC90 values 4- to 8-fold lower than that of ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC50/90 0.25/0.5 mg/L; 100% susceptible). Ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 (MIC50/90 0.12/0.5 mg/L) had the lowest MIC for KPC producers, followed by ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC50/90 2/4 mg/L; 98.0% susceptible). The same MIC90 values were obtained for ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 (MIC50/90 0.25/1 mg/L) and ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC50/90 1/1 mg/L; 100.0% susceptible) for isolates carrying blaOXA-48-like. VNRX-5236 decreased the ceftibuten MIC at least 16-fold for three isolates carrying blaOXA-48-like and blaKPC.

conclusionsVNRX-5236 rescued the in vitro activity of ceftibuten against Enterobacterales carrying common serine β-lactamases, including ESBL, AmpC and the KPC and OXA-48-like carbapenemases. Ceftibuten/VNRX-5236 may have potential as an oral treatment for infections caused by resistant Enterobacterales, while sparing carbapenems.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCeftibutenMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesCarbapenemsCeftibuten

Identifiers

PMID34849977
PMCPMC8865001
OpenAlexW3217005752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.