Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849962›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care2021

Coproduction in the management of individuals with cleft lip and palate in South Africa: the Ekhaya Lethu model.

Phumzile Hlongwa, Laetitia C Rispel

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Comparison of Goslon Yardstick and Cephalometric Analysis in Nonsyndromic Unilateral Cleft lip and Palate Individuals in the Western Cape, South Africa.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Phumzile HlongwaSchool of Oral Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 5 York Road, Johannesburg 2001, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-8052-9275
Laetitia C RispelCentre for Health Policy & South African Research Chairs Initiative, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-7806-6331
University of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

Faculty of Health Sciences Research Office of the University of the WitwatersrandSouth African Society of Orthodontists Gerald GavronThe South African Dental Association Dentistry Developmental Foundation TrustWellcome Trust 102219
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveCleft lip and palate (CLP), one of the most common congenital anomalies of the craniofacial complex, has a worldwide prevalence rate of 1 in 700 live births. In South Africa, a middle-income country, the CLP prevalence rate is 0.3 per 1000 live births in the public health sector. The complexity of the condition requires that individuals with CLP be treated by a multi-disciplinary team of health professionals, with the integral involvement of caregivers and families.

methodsBetween 2015 and 2018, we conducted a cross-sectional study entitled: The epidemiology and care of individuals with cleft lip and palate in South Africa, in fulfilment of a Doctor of Philosophy degree. The study setting consisted of 11 specialized academic centres (nine central hospitals and two specialized dental hospitals) that are situated in six of South Africa's nine provinces. The study used a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods and consisted of four distinct but inter-linked components. The first component consisted of a record review of CLP data over a 2-year period to determine the prevalence of CLP in the public sector of South Africa. The second component consisted of a survey of the leaders or heads of the health care teams in the 11 specialized centres to determine the current approach to CLP care provision. The third component consisted of a survey among CLP team members to measure inter-professional collaboration. The fourth component consisted of interviews with parents or caregivers on their perceptions of health service provision and support for children with CLP.We draw on the findings of this large empirical study on CLP in South Africa's public health sector and the theory and principles of health care service coproduction to present the Ekhaya Lethu model for the management of CLP.

resultsThe conceptual design of Ekhaya Lethu derives from the findings of each of the study components. We describe the possible application of the model in the coproduction of health care to examine the roles, relationships and aims of the multidisciplinary team in CLP management. We highlight both the implications and challenges of coproduction in the care and management of CLP for multidisciplinary health teams, the caregivers and families of individuals with CLP, and for health managers and policy makers.

conclusionThe proposed Ekhaya Lethu model introduces a discourse on coproduction in the design and implementation of quality health care to individuals with CLP in South Africa and other low-and middle-income countries.

Indexed as

Cleft LipCleft PalateChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSouth Africacleft lip and palatecoproductionEkhaya Lethuquality of careSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID34849962
PMCPMC8633900
OpenAlexW3215212608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.