Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849838›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Prediction ability of genome-wide markers in Pinus taeda L. within and between population is affected by relatedness to the training population and trait genetic architecture.

Edwin Lauer, James Holland, Fikret Isik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edwin LauerDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8846-6232
James HollandUSDA-ARS Plant Science Research Unit, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4341-9675
Fikret IsikDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2833-7919
North Carolina State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic prediction has the potential to significantly increase the rate of genetic gain in tree breeding programs. In this study, a clonally replicated population (n = 2063) was used to train a genomic prediction model. The model was validated both within the training population and in a separate population (n = 451). The prediction abilities from random (20% vs 80%) cross validation within the training population were 0.56 and 0.78 for height and stem form, respectively. Removal of all full-sib relatives within the training population resulted in ∼50% reduction in their genomic prediction ability for both traits. The average prediction ability for all 451 individual trees was 0.29 for height and 0.57 for stem form. The degree of genetic linkage (full-sib family, half sib family, unrelated) between the training and validation sets had a strong impact on prediction ability for stem form but not for height. A dominant dwarfing allele, the first to be reported in a conifer species, was discovered via genome-wide association studies on linkage Group 5 that conferred a 0.33-m mean height reduction. However, the QTL was family specific. The rapid decay of linkage disequilibrium, large genome size, and inconsistencies in marker-QTL linkage phase suggest that large, diverse training populations are needed for genomic selection in Pinus taeda L.

Indexed as

Pinus taedaPlant BreedingGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypeLinkage DisequilibriumModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotidecloned progeny testscross-validationGBLUPGenomic Predictiongenomic relationshipsGenPredGWASlinkage disequilibriumloblolly pineQTLShared Data Resource

Identifiers

PMID34849838
PMCPMC9210318
OpenAlexW3215005858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.