Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849804›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2021

Copy number evolution in simple and complex tandem repeats across the C57BL/6 and C57BL/10 inbred mouse lines.

Jullien M Flynn, Emily J Brown, Andrew G Clark

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Meiotic drive in house mice: mechanisms, consequences, and insights for human biology.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jullien M FlynnDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5999-4781
Emily J BrownDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
Andrew G ClarkDepartment of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7159-8511
Cornell University · US

Funding

Heterochromatin and satellite repeat sequence variation in natural populationsR01GM119125 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI BARBASH, DANIEL A, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2017 to 2020
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM119125NIH HHS R01 GM119125
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Simple sequence tandem repeats are among the most rapidly evolving compartments of the genome. Some repeat expansions are associated with mammalian disease or meiotic segregation distortion, yet the rates of copy number change across generations are not well known. Here, we use 14 distinct sublineages of the C57BL/6 and C57BL/10 inbred mouse strains, which have been evolving independently over about 300 generations, to estimate the rates of copy number changes in genome-wide tandem repeats. Rates of change varied across repeats and across lines. Notably, CAG, whose expansions in coding regions are associated with many neurological and genetic disorders, was highly stable in copy number, likely indicating stabilizing selection. Rates of change were positively correlated with copy number, but the direction and magnitude of changes varied across lines. Some mouse lines experienced consistent losses or gains across most simple repeats, but this did not correlate with copy number changes in complex repeats. Rates of copy number change were similar between simple repeats and the more abundant complex repeats after normalization by copy number. Finally, the Y-specific centromeric repeat had a fourfold higher rate of change than the homologous centromeric repeat on other chromosomes. Structural differences in satellite complexity, or restriction to the Y chromosome and elevated mutation rates of the male germline, may explain the higher rate of change. Overall, our work underscores the mutational fluidity of long tandem arrays of repeats, and the correlations and constraints between genome-wide tandem repeats, which suggest that turnover is not a completely neutral process.

Indexed as

CentromereDNA Copy Number VariationsAnimalsMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, Inbred StrainsMicrosatellite Repeatscentromereskmersmousemutationsatellite DNA

Identifiers

PMID34849804
PMCPMC8496272
OpenAlexW3168528295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.