Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849802›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2022

Bayesian multitrait kernel methods improve multienvironment genome-based prediction.

Osval Antonio Montesinos-López, José Cricelio Montesinos-López, Abelardo Montesinos-López, Juan Manuel Ramírez-Alcaraz, Jesse Poland, Ravi Singh, Susanne Dreisigacker, Leonardo Crespo, Sushismita Mondal, Velu Govidan and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Non-linear kernel methods for genomic prediction of soybean yield and quality in multi-environment trials.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Osval Antonio Montesinos-LópezFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima 28040, Mexico.
José Cricelio Montesinos-LópezDepartamento de Estadística, Centro de Investigación en Matemáticas, Guanajuato 36023, Mexico.
Abelardo Montesinos-LópezDepartamento de Matemáticas, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Exactas e Ingenierías (CUCEI), Guadalajara 44430, Mexico.
Juan Manuel Ramírez-AlcarazFacultad de Telemática, Universidad de Colima, Colima 28040, Mexico.
Jesse PolandDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7856-1399
Ravi SinghInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-4676-5071
Susanne DreisigackerInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3546-5989
Leonardo CrespoInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.
Sushismita MondalInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.
Velu GovidanInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.
Philomin JulianaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-6922-0173
Julio Huerta EspinoCampo Experimental Valle de Mexico, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias (INIFAP), Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, Texcoco 56235, Mexico.
Sandesh ShresthaDepartment of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA.
Rajeev K VarshneyInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad 502324, India.
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km 45, Carretera Mexico-Veracruz, CP 52640, Texoco, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

When multitrait data are available, the preferred models are those that are able to account for correlations between phenotypic traits because when the degree of correlation is moderate or large, this increases the genomic prediction accuracy. For this reason, in this article, we explore Bayesian multitrait kernel methods for genomic prediction and we illustrate the power of these models with three-real datasets. The kernels under study were the linear, Gaussian, polynomial, and sigmoid kernels; they were compared with the conventional Ridge regression and GBLUP multitrait models. The results show that, in general, the Gaussian kernel method outperformed conventional Bayesian Ridge and GBLUP multitrait linear models by 2.2-17.45% (datasets 1-3) in terms of prediction performance based on the mean square error of prediction. This improvement in terms of prediction performance of the Bayesian multitrait kernel method can be attributed to the fact that the proposed model is able to capture nonlinear patterns more efficiently than linear multitrait models. However, not all kernels perform well in the datasets used for evaluation, which is why more than one kernel should be evaluated to be able to choose the best kernel.

Indexed as

GenomeModels, GeneticBayes TheoremGenotypePhenotypegenomic-enabled predictiongenomic predictionGenPredkernel methodsmultitraitplant breedingshared data resources

Identifiers

PMID34849802
PMCPMC9210316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.