ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2021
Phylogenetic relationships and codon usage bias amongst cluster K mycobacteriophages.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Canonical fact versus hypothesis testing to decipher transmission of non-tuberculous and tuberculous mycobacteria: a comparative review.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2025Review
- Intraspecific and interspecific variations in the synonymous codon usage in mitochondrial genomes of 8 pleurotus strains.BMC genomics · 2024Article
- Comprehensive analysis of codon bias in 13Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Analysis of synonymous codon usage patterns in mitochondrial genomes of nineFrontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Identification of novel genera and subcluster classifications for mycobacteriophages.Microbiome research reports · 2023Article
- Phylogenomic analyses and host range prediction of cluster P mycobacteriophages.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- A Review on Mycobacteriophages: From Classification to Applications.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Computational Prediction of Bacteriophage Host Ranges.Microorganisms · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Bacteriophages infecting pathogenic hosts play an important role in medical research, not only as potential treatments for antibiotic-resistant infections but also offering novel insights into pathogen genetics and evolution. A prominent example is cluster K mycobacteriophages infecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis, a causative agent of tuberculosis in humans. However, as handling M. tuberculosis as well as other pathogens in a laboratory remains challenging, alternative nonpathogenic relatives, such as Mycobacterium smegmatis, are frequently used as surrogates to discover therapeutically relevant bacteriophages in a safer environment. Consequently, the individual host ranges of the majority of cluster K mycobacteriophages identified to date remain poorly understood. Here, we characterized the complete genome of Stinson, a temperate subcluster K1 mycobacteriophage with a siphoviral morphology. A series of comparative genomic analyses revealed strong similarities with other cluster K mycobacteriophages, including the conservation of an immunity repressor gene and a toxin/antitoxin gene pair. Patterns of codon usage bias across the cluster offered important insights into putative host ranges in nature, highlighting that although all cluster K mycobacteriophages are able to infect M. tuberculosis, they are less likely to have shared an evolutionary infection history with Mycobacterium leprae (underlying leprosy) compared to the rest of the genus' host species. Moreover, subcluster K1 mycobacteriophages are able to integrate into the genomes of Mycobacterium abscessus and Mycobacterium marinum-two bacteria causing pulmonary and cutaneous infections which are often difficult to treat due to their drug resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.