Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34849566›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2022

Probabilistic Machine Learning with Low-Cost Sensor Networks for Occupational Exposure Assessment and Industrial Hygiene Decision Making.

Andrew N Patton, Konstantin Medvedovsky, Christopher Zuidema, Thomas M Peters, Kirsten Koehler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew N PattonDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0637-6450
Konstantin MedvedovskyQR Analytics, Washington DC, USA.
Christopher ZuidemaDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington Hans Rosling Center for Population Health, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2233-2706
Thomas M PetersDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1698-8856
Kirsten KoehlerDepartment of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

Pulmonary Toxicology Facility CoreP30ES005605 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Brandi Janssen · 1990 to 2026
$40.5M
Targeted Research Training CoreT42OH008428 · OH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI RAMACHANDRAN, GURUMURTHY · 2005 to 2025
$31.1M
An Inexpensive Monitoring Network to Assess Workplace Aerosol ExposuresR01OH010533 · OH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KOEHLER, KIRSTEN ANNE, PETERS, THOMAS MICHAEL · 2014 to 2017
$1.9M
ACL HHS R01OH010533Johns Hopkins Education and Research Center for Occupational Safety and Health T42 OH0008428NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES005605NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH010533NIOSH CDC HHS R01OH010533NIOSH CDC HHS T42 OH008428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational exposure assessments are dominated by small sample sizes and low spatial and temporal resolution with a focus on conducting Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulatory compliance sampling. However, this style of exposure assessment is likely to underestimate true exposures and their variability in sampled areas, and entirely fail to characterize exposures in unsampled areas. The American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) has developed a more realistic system of exposure ratings based on estimating the 95th percentiles of the exposures that can be used to better represent exposure uncertainty and exposure variability for decision-making; however, the ratings can still fail to capture realistic exposure with small sample sizes. Therefore, low-cost sensor networks consisting of numerous lower-quality sensors have been used to measure occupational exposures at a high spatiotemporal scale. However, the sensors must be calibrated in the laboratory or field to a reference standard. Using data from carbon monoxide (CO) sensors deployed in a heavy equipment manufacturing facility for eight months from August 2017 to March 2018, we demonstrate that machine learning with probabilistic gradient boosted decision trees (GBDT) can model raw sensor readings to reference data highly accurately, entirely removing the need for laboratory calibration. Further, we indicate how the machine learning models can produce probabilistic hazard maps of the manufacturing floor, creating a visual tool for assessing facility-wide exposures. Additionally, the ability to have a fully modeled prediction distribution for each measurement enables the use of the AIHA exposure ratings, which provide an enhanced industrial decision-making framework as opposed to simply determining if a small number of measurements were above or below a pertinent occupational exposure limit. Lastly, we show how a probabilistic modeling exposure assessment with high spatiotemporal resolution data can prevent exposure misclassifications associated with traditional models that rely exclusively on mean or point predictions.

Indexed as

Occupational ExposureOccupational HealthDecision MakingEnvironmental MonitoringHumansMachine LearningManufacturing and Industrial Facilitiescarbon monoxideexposure assessmentmachine learningoccupational exposure assessmentsensor networks

Identifiers

PMID34849566
PMCPMC9630391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.